0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
46 replies
69 recasts
410 reactions
1 reply
7 recasts
64 reactions
2 replies
2 recasts
40 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
19 reactions
Whatโs the real difference between a nation-state and a network state with a permanent location? Like, wouldnโt it just end up being an โinnovativeโ nation-state that uses last tech advancements and trying out new market, governance, taxation and redistribution mechanisms?
I get that network states might need less enforcement in some cases, but how would they enforce still important laws? Would it still come down to physical enforcement? And if so, does that mean theyโd have a monopoly on violence, like a traditional state? Even if the law enforcement becomes private, weโre not changing much the primitives, and that would be necessary at least for stuff like boundaries and sovereignty, no?
And what happens when people have kids, do the kids automatically become citizens of the network state? What if they are poor? Will some rights be above everything?
Honestly Iโm struggling not to think that a permanent location network state wouldnโt eventually just morph into a nation-state. 2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction