tldr (tim reilly) pfp

tldr (tim reilly)

@tldr

1975 Following
150784 Followers
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
8 replies
2 recasts
55 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
1 reply
3 recasts
15 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
0 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
4 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
7 replies
1 recast
32 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
17 replies
8 recasts
77 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
5 replies
3 recasts
53 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama: + I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria. + Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest. + And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite. + However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not. tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)
30 replies
32 recasts
212 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
17 replies
3 recasts
54 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
4 replies
1 recast
29 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
2 replies
2 recasts
23 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
8 replies
14 recasts
77 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
3 replies
3 recasts
34 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
4 replies
6 recasts
42 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
3 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
24 replies
8 recasts
158 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
4 replies
1 recast
29 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
7 replies
0 recast
52 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
4 replies
1 recast
40 reactions