Stephan on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Stephan pfp

Discuss https://x.com/jacobandreou/status/1832665444651880628

25 replies

7 recasts

79 reactions

Stephan pfp

Imo he’s right that users don’t want to choose their algo That doesn’t mean the user’s ability to choose isn’t extremely important

6 replies

0 recast

44 reactions

sean pfp

i'm assuming the argument here is that choices overwhelm the user. this is true, but there is no rule that "choosing an algorithm" must be complicated, or that it must be forced on the user. twitter allows you to create lists of curated content in separate feeds. that sounds very similar to "choosing an algorithm" to me.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Jack Yeh (Hiring Eng) pfp

Jack Yeh (Hiring Eng)

Perhaps this is the wrong framing. I don't want to "choose an algorithm". But I do want my feed to maximise "time well spent" instead of trying to capture every last bit of my attention.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩

x has "for you" and “following”?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Eren🎩 pfp

arent the consumers the users?? i think the best consumer product is one that allows consumer opinions

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tk¹ pfp

Farcaster literally gives users the chance to choose their algorithm with the different clients and even if you’re not satisfied you can easily build yours It definitely is a good idea as it is so far working out no?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp

I don't understand what this means. 1. Is it a bad idea because it will ruin your product for some reason? 2. Is it a bad idea because users will be driven away if they are given the option to choose an algo? 3. Is it just a clickbait to state that most users will not care about this option even if you offer it, and you have to consider if it's worth the cost to satisfy this very small percentage that will get value out of it?

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Estelle pfp

What if most users are builders? Like here?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tommy pfp

Users don’t really know what they want, there’s also the risk of fragmentation So I agree that it is not totally a great idea What do you think??

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Mike | Abundance pfp

Mike | Abundance

Most users just need a default option, but some power users would want choices. I'm sure that if you tell people algo Y is good for whatever metric they want to maximize they'd rather have the choice than not

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Les Greys pfp

lately when I refresh warpcast, I constantly get different cast to show up, sometimes i just refresh multiple times for the sake of doing it in hopes the top cast catches my attention. Most times I feel disappointed so I revert back to my manual creation of notifications. I think if the UX is done right, choosing your algo is worthwhile if the user can have the sense of the change. If not, "choose an app not algo" applies as Dan says. Just requires deep creativity imo.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Catabolismo pfp

Imo this view underestimates users. They are actually capable of choosing what's best for themselves, with the right UI. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x66d33315

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nkemjika.eth pfp

Lettting users chose their algo is definitely a way to go; how you consume the content is in your hands. Sometimes i want a chronological feed and some other times i don’t mind it being random… I don’t agree with this; i might be missing something or maybe it’s because I am not creating/investing in consumer apps.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Double D pfp

The idea has its merits, but also presents its own challenges tho. For most consumer products, simplifying choices and relying on expert-designed algorithms might be a better approach to give way for an engaging user experience.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

downshift pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

David pfp

@promptrotator.eth

Aren’t all users choosing an algo as a consequence of what app they use? Something tells me curation and moderation are company scale endeavors

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ns pfp

I think there’s some conflation of terminology here but taking him at face value, I agree. If he means users shouldn’t be able to curate what they see to some extent then it’s a hard disagree.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩 pfp

Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩

if you sent me a website right now with N algorithms (marketplace) that I could buy as an NFT and that had a finite supply I would buy 5 (given the infra that we’d have where to plug them, ofc)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Abubakar🎩 pfp

This is quite controversial to me I feel algorithms are great indicators, from which a lot of relevant information could be deduced Ignoring algorithms means ignoring relevant data Why would you think consumer products changes the need for algorithms ?? Difference in pattern among different individuals??

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction