Marc Andreessen pfp
Marc Andreessen
@pmarca
Suppose that “bullshit jobs” are real, but not for the reason Graeber says. What are the actual reasons? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs
20 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊Farcon pfp
Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊Farcon
@syed
2 reasons for me: Lack of competition. So having zero rates means free money means lots of bloat. Lack of entrepreneurial support. Government and institutions should bend backwards to encourage entrepreneurship. If 80% are workers, 20% are founders. But made to feel it’s only 1% (you will fail.) < 1 bill =\= failur
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nico.cast🎩  pfp
Nico.cast🎩
@n
Too many smoothie teams! Related essay on how Twitter could be the first trillion dollar company with less than 500 headcount farcaster://casts/0x...ccef1e0ab9
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jeff Feiwell pfp
Jeff Feiwell
@hyper
Straussian govt jobs programs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Insufficient evolutionary pressure at the organizational level
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben  🟪 pfp
Ben 🟪
@benersing
At one point they weren't “bullshit jobs” and are a relic of a different era / model of commerce.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Diego Basch pfp
Diego Basch
@dbasch
People like to get together and be part of something larger than themselves. Many live under the illusion that they would not work if only they had sufficient money. That is generally bullshit, as you know.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bennet pfp
bennet
@bgrill.eth
cc: @polk
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zane Austen pfp
Zane Austen
@zane
Low interest rates
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
the Gervais principle https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2009/10/07/the-gervais-principle-or-the-office-according-to-the-office/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kepano pfp
kepano
@kepano
Selfish herd behavior Industrialisation/technology reduces the cost of a comfortable lifestyle Once people reach comfort they insulate themselves from the risk of losing their job by distributing the work to more fireable people The pattern is fractal within an org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selfish_herd_theory
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
cascading principal agent problems
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cyrus 🎩  ᖽ  🍄 pfp
cyrus 🎩 ᖽ 🍄
@cyrus
since the majority stopped hunting and growing they need something to do, and some place to gather.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

zico pfp
zico
@zico
resumes are highly problematic, we could start with that.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sachin pfp
Sachin
@sach
- hard to handle coordination headwinds at scale - rare in American corporate culture to accept a mistake and shut down a project fast once it's capitalized https://komoroske.com/slime-mold/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

mfn🌀 pfp
mfn🌀
@melissa
Have you read Dee Hock? Because “Without question, the most abundant, least expensive, most underutilized and constantly abused resource in the world today is human ingenuity.” —https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/594968.One_from_Many
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Structural: When stakeholders (eg, founders) are no longer “on the ground”, people doing hiring are incentivized to minimize personal effort, not to maximize project health. Psychological: Managers without clear vision who are also afraid of failing can feel “if I just get random bodies around, maybe this will
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Paul Millerd pfp
Paul Millerd
@pmillerd
Religious faith in the job to save us and smooth out finances and the common knowledge that every other way is risky? Love the obama quote in here where he explicitly said they can’t go too hard on insurers because what would they do with the jobs.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

chaseadam17 pfp
chaseadam17
@chaseadam17
being employed for any reason other than the org's mission. it's illuminating to ask ppl what the most important part of their job is that doesn't show up on their JD.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Managerial (capitalism) multi-polar traps.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction