Jake Chervinsky pfp
Jake Chervinsky
@jchervinsky
What do you not understand about crypto law or policy that you wish someone would ELI5?
22 replies
114 recasts
254 reactions
​woj ツ pfp
​woj ツ
@woj.eth
is dropping a token legal or not
9 replies
1 recast
167 reactions
phil pfp
phil
@phil
why can't my cap table be fully onchain?
3 replies
1 recast
116 reactions
isaac pfp
isaac
@zaak
why isn’t the US govt trying its best to accommodate crypto? or at least, create an environment that’s more incentivising for crypto companies? considering how much innovation has already come out of US’ crypto space.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
dropping a token (do's and don't's) (permissible and not permissible)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
eirrann | he/him pfp
eirrann | he/him
@eirrann.eth
What does the recent SEC warning to OpenSea mean for small independent artists like me who mint our artwork for sale as NFTs?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
wen is a token earned as a product of an agreement to do work with a sytem/ecosystem and wen is it considered an investment contract? Half the fun of DAOs is indy contractors earning token stake but lack of clarity at intersection of securities law, contract law for services, and employment law has me confused.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
seems like pseudonymity is effectively in name only going forward? we are running out of ramps to protect principles of economic freedom as almost all exchanges have been toppled in the last couple years.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Sean Wince 🎩 pfp
Sean Wince 🎩
@seanwince
Even with the favorable legislation that was considered in Congress recently in the last year, wouldn't it still deem a lot of crypto assets as securities, hindering the ability of those teams and startups to innovate? Shouldn't we be pushing for legislation that creates an entirely new legal framework for these assets instead of going by the same old howey test?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Michael Depetrillo pfp
Michael Depetrillo
@klassicd
Would the elimination of accredited investor laws solve most of our problems? It seems like it then wouldn't matter what is or isn't a security.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jack pfp
Jack
@jackten
Why does the government hate freedom so much?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Corbin Page pfp
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
What are the bull and bear scenarios for crypto policy wrt US based crypto founders? Are you optimistic or pessimistic for 2025?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sumaa pfp
Sumaa
@sumaa
regarding the whole "code is law" argument, how well does this holdup if at all? i.e a scenario where users funds are drained at the benefit of a single individual that clearly wasn't the protocols intention to make a design as so
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Patrick pfp
Patrick
@patrickayelle.eth
More of a broad question about how you see the future of US healthcare apps on ethereum (that store health care data)What types of challenges will be challenges for this use case?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
is delaware still worth it?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thibauld pfp
Thibauld
@thibauld
Do you share Travis optimism that there is a non zero chance that the US could get a framework where tokens get "pseudo-security" features without being treated as securities? https://x.com/Travis_Kling/status/1830981168079974505?t=w4_3064g91PBnbZ9lbpFvA&s=19
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Which use cases outside of tokens are being held back by regulatory? A lot of talk of regulatory hurdles, but what’s actually held back other than people wanting to launch tokens.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Valhalla 1 🎩 pfp
Valhalla 1 🎩
@valhalla1
Is there levels of legalities in how much you hold of a token e.g. top holders face more risk as apposed to small holders
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thibauld pfp
Thibauld
@thibauld
Glad you ask 😅 Over the years at Fairmint, we came across a case several times, and we've seen customers apply different rules depending on their lawyers... which puzzles us a bit. I'm not sure if this is "ELI5able," but here's the case: The issuer is US-based. He fundraises using a Reg D exemption for US persons and a Reg S exemption for non-US persons. A non-US entity wants to invest. Some beneficial owners (not the majority) of this entity are US persons. Can the entity invest under Reg S or must it necessarily invest under Reg D? Are there some general guidelines other than the traditional "it depends on the facts and circumstances"? From what I've seen, the answer depends on how conservative the lawyer is: the most secure way is to funnel the non-US entity under the Reg D exemption, but sometimes, the non-US entity doesn't qualify as an accredited investor.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sterling Crispin pfp
Sterling Crispin
@sterlingcrispin
If I do something that seems legal today, why is it they can decide later it’s not, and fuck me over? That type of thing terrifies me as a developer and artist
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction