Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
So it makes sense to me that Google, which derives most of its revenue from search, would find the advent of LLMs to be existential to its core business. But why do you think Meta is investing as much in AI, given that social networks are pretty sticky and wouldn't necessarily be impacted from a business model standpoint?
22 replies
2 recasts
28 reactions
Shawki Sukkar pfp
Shawki Sukkar
@shawki
It’s a backdoor to search
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
six pfp
six
@six
feels like ai would play a huge role in metaverse-ish stuff? eg generative reality, ai friends, things like that
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
CHIC pfp
CHIC
@chicbangs.eth
imo meta thinks they’re solving the loneliness epidemic with ai friends and they’ve also shown they follow trends
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
Back door to the metaverse vision + if AR/VR/XR are going to usher in the next wave of personal computing devices, AI is likely to play a role there
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
Definitely as a way to capitalize more on search. As an SEO, I can tell you one of the most alarming trends Google is seeing right now is people appending keywords like + reddit onto search terms. Use a keyword tool and any informational searches all now have a “+ reddit” keyword with high volume. People are getting wise to manipulated search results and looking for content written by actual humans. Basically, they’re losing search volume to a slew of competitors, including social. Speaking of this, I think not having individual casts indexed by Google is a missed opportunity for FC. It might be a simple fix to get more FC content indexed and showing up in Google. Currently, it’s only indexing profiles for the most part. Could bring a lot of longtail traffic if individual casts and comment chains were also indexed. A decent SEO will be able to take a look at your search console and tell you what’s up.
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Breck Yunits pfp
Breck Yunits
@breck
Zuck seems to genuinely love tech and spend his capital on pushing it forward.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Giuliano Giacaglia pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
They want to own the next platform and LLMs may become a new OS https://x.com/karpathy/status/1723140519554105733
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rish pfp
rish
@rish
Zuck builds tech first, monetization after Facebook has learned that everything helps ad based monetization in some way (Automatic AI generated ads; businesses have an account and it automatically spends out of that)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Commoditize thine complement. More content, more engagement, same network.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
a1z2 pfp
a1z2
@a1z2
It’s not about survival, it’s about longevity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Katsuya pfp
Katsuya
@kn
It could be as simple as their scars from missing the mobile wave (at the platform level, not just apps). Now, they take every potential platform shift (VR, crypto, LLMs) very seriously.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gwynne Michele pfp
Gwynne Michele
@thecurioushermit
Given the general negative reaction of Facebook audiences to AI, it's a very, very puzzling business decisions. Seems more like a personal interest of Zuckerberg's than a rational direction for the platform to take.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason pfp
Jason
@jachian
My guess is that all the mega tech companies have a lot to lose (not just Google) to see OpenAI lock the industry-leading LLM behind an API. You see partnerships that tell this story between Microsoft partnering with OpenAI and Amazon with Claude
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
I could see FB AI facilitating more engagement on the platform, especially for people that don't have an active friend group. This is going to have profound impact on their business model. Virtual friends will be perfect for advertisers. Also, FB social data is going to be a treasure throve for LLMs of big brands that pay to gain access.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kuririn pfp
Kuririn
@kuririn
Future-proofing, Zuck knows LLMs are the next big thing and he can’t afford to not participate.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Summaryjo802 pfp
Summaryjo802
@summaryjo802
Google needs LLMs for search revenue, while Meta may be preparing for competition or strategic growth in AI
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
g0hst.base.eth pfp
g0hst.base.eth
@g0hst
Market share in an "emerging" market.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Hathaway pfp
Joe Hathaway
@joehathaway
I deem their ambition is not just for search, we have witnessed how far ranges of business they have, AI is a torrent rn and they can’t simply get rid of it. One some level Apple could be regarded as a contrast in this issue.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡 pfp
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
AD targeting, powered by AI, will help Meta cross the uncanny valley (Yes I’m misusing the term but trying to convey a change from “spooky coincidences” that ad targeting currently has to “mildly useful and relevant”)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction