Colin on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Colin pfp

Which is more valuable to you, as a writer or reader? 1) Ability to subscribe and/or mint posts in-frame 2) Ability to read a post in-frame (assuming there was a 10x better solution to read in-frame than what we have right now) If you could only have (2) but not (1), would you be fine with that?

28 replies

11 recasts

77 reactions

Claus Wilke pfp

2 is more important than 1. Nobody subscribes or mints if they don't read.

0 reply

1 recast

4 reactions

moreReese pfp

Yes, I’d be fine with that. As far as the in-frame experience goes I value reading over subscribing and/or minting. If there’s a post or publication I want to mint or subscribe to, respectively, I don’t mind taking the extra few steps to do so out of frame

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Fran pfp

2 over 1. I want people to read what i write.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

aneri.base.eth pfp

as a reader, 2: read >> subscribe > mint Ideally I read then can subscribe/mint currently I subscribe to many in feed without reading or minting

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

YB pfp

As a writer #2 - having more people actually read the content in a frictionless way is by far the most important metric for me. I'd be totally okay not having 1. And between, subscribe & mint I'd say I would rather have the subscribe button

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

LGHT pfp

2. and yes would be fine w that trade off

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Daniel Fernandes pfp

Daniel Fernandes

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp

Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Garrett pfp

I want the ability to subscribe and read easily in-frame don’t care as much about minting in frame or it should be a secondary action (click thru to get to a mint button)

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

TPan pfp

2 - Paragraph frames are best for top of funnel and a 'preview' experience, ultimately leading to 1

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

BFG 🎩↑🌱 pfp

BFG 🎩↑🌱

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Mr Jon Kane 🎩 pfp

Mr Jon Kane 🎩

Yes I’d pick 2 over 1. As a reader I want to read first before subbing and if I’ve put that much time in I’m happy to click through to sub anyway. Ideal however would be to read and sub in frame. Mint in frame is less of a priority.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

al3jandro.eth pfp

Only (2) is important to me 👌

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Could have polled this in a frame. I vote 2 Everyone is reading first. This is the number one use case. Subscription comes later and minting comes even later after subscribing.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨 pfp

MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jay pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jacob pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Girl Gone Crypto pfp

Girl Gone Crypto

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gaoron.base.eth pfp

gaoron.base.eth

I’d prefer the ability to read posts in-frame. It enhances engagement and user experience, which is crucial for both writers and readers. While subscribing and minting posts are valuable, a superior reading experience would be my top priority.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction