Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
Which is more valuable to you, as a writer or reader? 1) Ability to subscribe and/or mint posts in-frame 2) Ability to read a post in-frame (assuming there was a 10x better solution to read in-frame than what we have right now) If you could only have (2) but not (1), would you be fine with that?
24 replies
10 recasts
59 reactions
Claus Wilke pfp
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
2 is more important than 1. Nobody subscribes or mints if they don't read.
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
Fran pfp
Fran
@0x99fran
2 over 1. I want people to read what i write.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
YB pfp
YB
@yb
As a writer #2 - having more people actually read the content in a frictionless way is by far the most important metric for me. I'd be totally okay not having 1. And between, subscribe & mint I'd say I would rather have the subscribe button
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
LGHT pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
2. and yes would be fine w that trade off
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BFG 🎩↑🌱 pfp
BFG 🎩↑🌱
@bfg
Yes 🙌
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mr Jon Kane 🎩 pfp
Mr Jon Kane 🎩
@mrjonkane.eth
Yes I’d pick 2 over 1. As a reader I want to read first before subbing and if I’ve put that much time in I’m happy to click through to sub anyway. Ideal however would be to read and sub in frame. Mint in frame is less of a priority.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Could have polled this in a frame. I vote 2 Everyone is reading first. This is the number one use case. Subscription comes later and minting comes even later after subscribing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TPan pfp
TPan
@tpan
2 - Paragraph frames are best for top of funnel and a 'preview' experience, ultimately leading to 1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ernest @ GC pfp
ernest @ GC
@ernestkou
i’m good with having 2 only. i don’t mind exiting the app to mint but the current way of reading in-frame is painful
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨 pfp
MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨
@metaend.eth
1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jay pfp
Jay
@jayhood
2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
moreReese pfp
moreReese
@morereese
Yes, I’d be fine with that. As far as the in-frame experience goes I value reading over subscribing and/or minting. If there’s a post or publication I want to mint or subscribe to, respectively, I don’t mind taking the extra few steps to do so out of frame
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
aneri.base.eth pfp
aneri.base.eth
@aneri
as a reader, 2: read >> subscribe > mint Ideally I read then can subscribe/mint currently I subscribe to many in feed without reading or minting
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Fernandes pfp
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
I want the ability to subscribe and read easily in-frame don’t care as much about minting in frame or it should be a secondary action (click thru to get to a mint button)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
al3jandro.eth ➡️ DevCon pfp
al3jandro.eth ➡️ DevCon
@al3jandro.eth
Only (2) is important to me 👌
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacob pfp
Jacob
@m1racle
2 probably
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gaoron.base.eth pfp
gaoron.base.eth
@gaoron
I’d prefer the ability to read posts in-frame. It enhances engagement and user experience, which is crucial for both writers and readers. While subscribing and minting posts are valuable, a superior reading experience would be my top priority.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction