Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
qw pfp
qw
@qw
From experience, part time / contractors for early stage startups are usually counterproductive. They just won’t be committed, loyal, and giving 120%, while incurring massive management overhead. Don’t believe I’ve ever seen a success story. Proper full time employees or don’t hire at all.
16 replies
4 recasts
33 reactions
Amir Bandeali pfp
Amir Bandeali
@amir
Not unless they have the potential to convert to full time. Then it becomes an open ended work trial, which is nice for both sides to build conviction in each other. 100% agree if there is no full time potential.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kien 🙏 pfp
Kien 🙏
@kienfam
Not sure that don’t hire at all is the solution. It’s about time to market. If the time spent to onboard, educate etc is lower than the value they bring might be ok. Talking about devs now. CM, bizdev, legal can be part-time
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fahad pfp
Fahad
@fahad
Kind of agree based on my experience as well. The first few hires are really crucial even if it costs you a little more
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Quix pfp
Quix
@quix
100% this. Also contractors are not going to wake up at 3am to fix a customer issue. The equity/responsibility that a full-time employee has is the best alarm clock.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
cats pfp
cats
@ilikecats
Agreed. It's simply the best way to burn money with little to show for when you're early on.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
matt 💭 pfp
matt 💭
@matthewmorek
If you approach hiring for your startup with a "let's get a contractor" mindset, as opposed to "let's get a suitable person to work with me on this specific project" then it's no wonder you get disappointed. If you get random people off the street, don't be surprised they don't fit. Type of contract doesn't matter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kerman pfp
kerman
@kerman
Eng roles yes. Non-end roles, no.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Poison Ivy pfp
Poison Ivy
@ivy
not quite seeing the massive management overhead
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
catdog pfp
catdog
@catdograinbow
It really depends - definitely agree if the contractor is a more junior engineer. We hired a part time contractor to build a specific frontend page and it was great because he was a senior engineer, capable of filling in the gaps and working pretty independently.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Panche I. pfp
Panche I.
@pisajeski
I think the opposite. I've experienced a startup with fractional execs, like fCTO, among first hires. They provide strategic value , motivated. Then a contractors or devs shops for implementing. Those are not as motivated, thus execs will oversee it. it is the cheapest and fastest option to validate product idea
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nazan Kurt pfp
Nazan Kurt
@nkkurt
Depends. Most companies don’t bother to hire from high inflation countries. There’s amazing, less tapped talent there and they only work in contract basis due to currency/laws. I hired them, even as founding engineers and would totally do it again.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Oxcatalyst🆔️ pfp
Oxcatalyst🆔️
@oxcatalyst
Ya thats true
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arsham pfp
Arsham
@arsham
depends on the role - the best hire is no hire though, if we’re talking true early stage
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mippo pfp
Mippo
@mippo
agree but I think once you hit a certain headcount (maybe 100-200) it starts to make more sense. helps avoid massive layoffs during the bear market. also - many crypto founders are inexperienced and don’t know how to make good use of contractors.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kristin eberth pfp
kristin eberth
@keliz
it depends. a senior contractor that can spin things up quickly and effectively can often have a lot of impact with less long term financial commitment required from the startup. it’s often v expensive to get someone great full time.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ツンデレ pfp
ツンデレ
@rosspeili.eth
It all breaks down to incentives. If your contractor is financially happy, he will take it more personally than you.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction