jbi
@jbi
It is nice to see a muscular response from people regarding Ethereum's technical identity as (rollup-centric) Roadmap and the implied Endgame. However, it does elide a little how Ethereum's social identity is and always has been somewhat ambiguous, which has not affected its position, which speaks for itself in marketcap and influence. But I do believe there is some truth to the 'identity crisis' there. Nobody can quite agree on a North Star for Ethereum, there is no Social Road Map and people fear even embedding one because they feel it would essentially be cultural centralisation. But I am somewhat concerned about it, about the question mark over what Ethereum is supposed to be, socially. Because on one hand it means we have multiple spinning narratives, none of which has widespread traction, which invites internal conflict and there be dragons (know your blockchain history). On the other, nature abhors a vacuum and if we don't fill it, someone else might, finding ourselves on the edge of our own territory. 0 reply
20 recasts
41 reactions
10 replies
7 recasts
27 reactions
22 replies
71 recasts
397 reactions
6 replies
8 recasts
30 reactions
5 replies
8 recasts
163 reactions
2 replies
11 recasts
50 reactions
7 replies
7 recasts
31 reactions
3 replies
4 recasts
8 reactions
29 replies
36 recasts
284 reactions
7 replies
5 recasts
25 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
14 reactions
10 replies
72 recasts
218 reactions
6 replies
26 recasts
194 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
29 reactions
30 replies
13 recasts
85 reactions
40 replies
65 recasts
269 reactions
14 replies
13 recasts
54 reactions
2 replies
8 recasts
20 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions
27 replies
30 recasts
158 reactions