keccers
@keccers.eth
I think this is probably better for the scientists, honestly. Social media is bad for your mental health. A loss for the rest of us, though https://x.com/emollick/status/1832904443702243453
10 replies
7 recasts
31 reactions
Omar
@dromar.eth
I was hoping Mastodon would gain steam since its structural framework aligns closely to academics with each field having its own server. But guess that didn’t catch on.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
⋆♱ 9̷0̷†մղ ♱⋆
@90tun
I thought reddit was the hub for such communities, welp, twitter has been falling off since everybody knows when
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
law
@traguy.eth
I don’t get how it’s better for scientists I thought academic communities on social media was meant to make things easier.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
plastic 🎩
@eeked.eth
250 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nuflark
@nuflark
So when we build a time machine, do we go back just far enough to prevent the board selling twitter? Or do we go even further back and bully Elon Musk as a youth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Iamrav3n.eth
@iamrav3n
What’s in it for the scientists?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Maxinne 👑🗿
@zuuye.eth
Social media is a very wide space And most of it would ruin you
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Freytrades🎩📈
@freymon.eth
thank goodness farcaster is a social network and not a social media right?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lostsol🌻
@lostsolx
I suspect that most people who complained about it getting worse, didn't know how to use it properly and were just letting "the algorithm" show them posts. If you only view posts of people you choose to follow in chronological order, then it should have been just as good or what do you think?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
22
@themuyideen.eth
I see what you mean, but we also need social media to help reach a broader audience. Can you think of any other ways to balance accessibility with mental health concerns
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
