Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp

Venkatesh Rao ☀️

@vgr

505 Following
89678 Followers
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Wife argues krycek is the real hero of x files She may be right https://x-files.fandom.com/wiki/Alex_Krycek
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
🫡 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/kanzi-the-bonobo-who-learned-language-and-made-stone-tools-dies-at-age-44/
3 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Science is mnemonics for remembering the future @keikreutler
2 replies
2 recasts
13 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
“One Weird Trick discovered by a quadrantologist summarizes all of Chinese philosophy. Chinese people hate him”
3 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Nice micro site explaining how to solve the meaning crisis. Spread the word.
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
The trivial case of Goodhart’s Law is confusing winning for being right
1 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
ChatGPT basically solved the meaning crisis The answer is 80% Viktor Frankl and 20% Daoism. All other options are either nonsense copes or preludes to authoritarianism. https://gist.github.com/vgururao/c40115340adc1fcfab4067612a8f5934
7 replies
1 recast
24 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Came up with a new pick 2 of 3 triangle for governance: Inviolate rules Bounded duty cycle (no "surges" of effort amplitude or frequency ever needed) Non-trivially bounded worst-case performance
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
A basic issue with SV is its full of genuine team players who hate operating alone and are happiest in 2-pizza teams. This means when they must choose between two terrible teams, they’ll pick one with some sort of lesser-of-two-evils logic, and do so with worked-up passion, not half-heartedly. It’s a hell-yeah-or-nah mentality even when all options are between hell-nah and meh. They won’t just kick back and do something solo for a while. If SV had decided to go Full Team Woke (not an improbable counterfactual around a Bernie fork) we’d be in a different sort of hellscape now. I need to put a hell-yeah spin on my mediocrity philosophy.
0 reply
1 recast
13 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
I liked the “it’s time to build” pmarca essay when it came out, in a very different era, but now I think the underlying idea is incoherent. Builder, unlike destroyer, is an aptitude, not a role anyone can play. And since building is a “creative destructive” process that you might naively assume can be unbundled into pure “creation” and pure “destruction” what general calls for a society-wide period of building do in the best case is try to elevate builders in status, but in the worst case simply unleash a wave of pure destruction much larger than any wave of building. And the building itself ends up being mostly naive “pure creation.” Ie doomed first-principles Xanadu projects. What’s the alternative? Recognize that “building” is just one aptitude and personality among many. The real challenge is recognizing that a finite game is ending and figuring out how to continue the infinite game by improvising a new finite game. And that comes from play-testing, not slogan-led missions.
1 reply
0 recast
24 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
SoP 2025 program is announced! Highlights: 1. Curriculum development grants for faculty who want to develop courses about protocol science/studies/entrepreneurship — $500k pool — deadline April 1 2. Protocol science fiction story contest, $5k in prizes; AI-assisted stories not just accepted but encouraged — deadline April 14 3. A distributed AI x blockchains workshop in Bangkok April 21-25; regional travel support available — deadline to register March 21 Plus a lot more. Please share with any educators and SF writers you know https://open.substack.com/pub/protocolized/p/sop-2025-accelerating-order?r=1cjha&utm_medium=ios
3 replies
13 recasts
23 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Yes! Mediocrity ftw :D
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Ok this idea is growing on me and is upgraded from minor to major. The options vs crypto example is peripheral. This is a way to view something much more fundamental — the explore-exploit tradeoff. For a fully certain value commodity, in a perfect competition market with instantaneous price discovery, the frontier collapses to a point at (1,1). A perfectly unbelievable fantasy collapses to (0, 0). The 45 degree ray is the fantasy-to-reality turnpike. As you learn more and the thing becomes more real, the frontier initially expands then contracts, with end points on the unit square perimeter. The (1,0) - (0,1) line is the explore-exploit transition frontier. When the frontier crosses that, you’re in fully convergent exploit mode. At that point you can start thinking about “IPO” or “exiting” the idea in some way, since either correlatedness and liquidity can be maxed out. The whole finance metaphor can be ditched. I’m calling it modal information theory — ie how possible worlds become real.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Theory: By the time there’s trust in a product, there’s no need for trust in the token. If the token doesn’t enable actually clever mechanics (eigenlayer is a good example maybe?) it is superfluous perhaps
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Industrial era societal capacity: Dinosaurs Trumpism & friends: Asteroid Protocols: Mammals
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Just came up with a principle that may already have a name: Correlation-Liquidity Tradeoff (CLTO): The correlatedness of a speculative asset to an underlying value thesis and its liquidity form a tradeoff curve. Private startup stock has high correlation low liquidity. Crypto tokens have low correlatedness high liquidity. Former requires IRR fictions. Latter can experience wild excursions based on factors having nothing to do with the thesis. Between them is a Pareto frontier Came up with this idea from a weird angle. I was actually thinking about how reward schedule tempo is slower than decision tempo, causing problems in reinforcement learning. Eg you are a novelist who writes 1000 words everyday but the reward schedule is every 40k words when you finish and ship a novel and get market feedback. Or a robot trying sequences of actions to accomplish a task. It only actually gets a reward when it finds a satisficing sequence. Agile iteration can increase feedback rate but not necessarily reward rate.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
A video chat where @timber and I riff on all things protocol, and provide some sneak previews of SoP 2025 programming (to be announced on Friday) https://contraptions.venkateshrao.com/p/video-recording-protocols-preview
0 reply
4 recasts
11 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Don’t drink and delve
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
delve or delve not, there is no prompt
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Substack note du jour https://substack.com/profile/2264734-venkatesh-rao/note/c-99998954
1 reply
4 recasts
12 reactions