Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Do you like the UX of long tweets in the X / Twitter mobile app? If yes, why? If no, why not?
54 replies
0 recast
57 reactions
six pfp
six
@six
i like it for writing but not for reading
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ πŸ’œ pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ πŸ’œ
@betashop.eth
i can tell you with certainty (data) that long tweets get A LOT more engagement than threads these days, and that when a thread does get engagement it's only the first post in the thread usually that gets any action
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
no I'd rather read a thread than long tweets
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Matt Solomon pfp
Matt Solomon
@msolomon.eth
If there’s just one long tweet it’s ok, when it’s a convo or thread of multiple long tweets the UX is awful because I have to click every tweet to read it
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Eric Platon pfp
Eric Platon
@ic
No. Constraint is source of innovation. Hard constraints on # of chars: * incentivizes to go to the essential. * incentivizes iterative story developments, live. * allows readers to highlight the pieces they ❀️, the ones they πŸ”„, and others. * allows wild drifts creating semantic trees easier to follow.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
julien pfp
julien
@julien51.eth
No. Extra clicks to read + wall of text
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ben pfp
Ben
@benbassler.eth
I definitely prefer threads, feels a lot more organised and digestible with every post representing e.g. a different topic
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
crispz pfp
crispz
@crispz.eth
i prefer threads over long tweets
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
TiⓂ️brrr 🎩🧒 ↑ πŸ– pfp
TiⓂ️brrr 🎩🧒 ↑ πŸ–
@twb
Long posts removed twitters brevity and Quotables, arguably its killer features.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
No, but it must be design since I enjoy reading Substack on my phone. My guess is spacing and typography
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
maurelian pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
Might work if you add markdown support first. Otherwise I’m skeptical
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ncitron.eth pfp
ncitron.eth
@ncitron.eth
On Twitter I hate it but for some reason I want it on Farcaster. Not sure if this is because Farcaster and Twitter are fundamentally different platforms (especially with channels), or because I'm dumb and didn't learn my lesson the first time around.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Brandon Kumar pfp
Brandon Kumar
@brandonkumar
Brevity forces clarity.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
No if I click on it and it’s too long it overwhelms If tweet is just a little longer than regular thing I click show more for 3 words to finish reading and need to go back to feed which is even more annoying
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦ pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
I prefer threads because I know they’re a thread before I start reading. When I expand the tweet and get bombarded with an essay it throws me off. I ain’t reading allat
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
I like the writing experience, but you lose that per-chunk like/reply split points which are also kinda special in their own way.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Kyle McCollom pfp
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
Threads tend to get me to read. Feels more consumable. Long form tweets make me bail often.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r
compared to one short tweet, it's not good at all. compared to a thread, it's a tradeoff of scrolling for extra clicks. worst UX is thread of long tweets with extra clicks.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions