Victor Ma 🧾 on Warpcast

Victor Ma 🧾 pfp

when you hear "onchain" do you think 1) literally on the blockchain 2) generally something to do with web3/crypto

42 replies

2 recasts

38 reactions

Semui pfp

1, but with the caveat the actual content doesn’t need to be onchain as long as it is decentralized (iPods, Arweave). The “marker” must be on the blockchain.

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

FT pfp

previously - 2 currently - 1

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Colin pfp

1, but even that’s a misnomer since most people that say onchain refer to NFTs which store data off chain

2 replies

1 recast

3 reactions

tldr (tim reilly) pfp

tldr (tim reilly)

Obviously: O ptimizing for N eutrality, C redibility, & H istory by A rranging I ncentives N ovelly

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

🪷 pfp

1) literally on a blockchain

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Royal pfp

@jessepollak smoking a cigar on Base of if I'm on honest.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Harper Reed pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Trish🫧 pfp

1 but it’s being thrown around more loosely again. I just need a consensus on the definition because everything is so hard 😂 If it’s 2, what’s the word for 1?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

frdysk.framedl.eth pfp

frdysk.framedl.eth

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Yash Karthik pfp

1. literally on-chain, or at least smth like an event that could be indexed.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Zach pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

chandresh 🪴 pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rileybeans pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Justin Hunter pfp

@polluterofminds

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

📿 zach harris 🙏🏼 pfp

📿 zach harris 🙏🏼

@zachharris.eth

I find the term triggering… sometimes even bordering on micro aggression

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

🦒 pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

slobo pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gökhan Turhan pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction