Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Against choosing your political allegiances based on who is "pro-crypto" https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/07/17/procrypto.html
113 replies
695 recasts
3006 reactions
Litewood pfp
Litewood
@ligerwoods
"internationalism" very nice way of phrasing "globalism".
3 replies
0 recast
21 reactions
Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Excellent post! I noticed a very small typo if you’d like to fix it for clarity: I imagine you meant “most”
1 reply
0 recast
26 reactions
Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
Appreciate you writing this https://x.com/ljxie/status/1667236973260447751
3 replies
67 recasts
628 reactions
brownalytics 🎩 pfp
brownalytics 🎩
@brownalytics
On point. Just a note on Cypherpunk. True that it had “broader techno-libertarian ethos” but this description minimizes the contribution of the then-radical left, which I’d argue is a pattern that can be connected to why the current broad left don’t see themselves aligned with this movement. Anarchist, socialist, even communist ideas are hard coded in Cypherpunk. We need look no further than the woman who coined the term itself: Jude Milhon, active in civil rights, feminism, radical health care, supportive of New Left ideals, and lived communally. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jude_Milhon Great read. Just advocating for a more inclusive narrative that reflects who really helped shape the ethos and adds nuance to the distortion that this shit was birthed by a bunch of libertarian bros.
5 replies
1 recast
24 reactions
ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
could not agree more. voting for a candidate because they are pro-crypto is a big mistake.
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
Satoshi Tomatomoto pfp
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
All the bitcoin maximalists are going to love this. 😆
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Sterling Schuyler pfp
Sterling Schuyler
@sterschuyler
"The crypto industry is uniquely international, and so immigration law is crypto law. Which politicians, and which countries, recognize this?" YES. The first time crypto really "clicked" with me was when I realized how important it is/will be for immigrants and asylum seekers. "Crypto friendly" is more than 💵
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kepano pfp
kepano
@kepano
if the goal is to create technology that is resilient to government intervention, then the legal status of this technology should be irrelevant — a regime that is against such technology paradoxically creates better incentives for its development, whereas the opposite allows external dependencies to creep in
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hunter Horsley pfp
Hunter Horsley
@hunter
Love this. Well said. And worth saying.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mats pfp
Mats
@mats
There's an election and you equally dislike both candidates. One says they support crypto. Which one do you pick?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift pfp
downshift
@downshift.eth
I've sponsored you through @microsub! microsub will be opening to new sponsors and nominees soon. 47 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Greg Lang pfp
Greg Lang
@designheretic
Do you see an appreciable difference between choosing political allegiances based on who espouses pro-crypto rhetoric and boycotting political support based on who supports anti-crypto policies?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tim/vortac pfp
tim/vortac
@vortac
This 🤝
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
It's unclear that any political party out there would support true anonymous online payments, sadly. The political pandering seems to be mostly aimed at the casino parts.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Britt Kim pfp
Britt Kim
@brittkim.eth
Reasonable.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
@mazmhussain there's a toll goods solution for journalists.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
103 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben - [C/x] pfp
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
I agree conceptually with the ideals you've laid out, but it reads like an “all or nothing” call on Washington, which history would suggest would lead to slower adoption and more attack. Advancing a goal via modern politics requires compromise, choosing one’s battles and securing wins with new allies when possible. How would you propose people work within the existing system to take steps towards the ideal state, without making any concessions?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
the enemy of my enemy is rarely my friend yes
0 reply
0 recast
31 reactions