Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
While it's great that the auto-follow list is no more, the damage has already been done in that any (off-the-shelf) influence-driven algorithm will heavily skew to favor accounts that were on that list.. unless proper adjustments have been made And if you're developing your own proprietary influence-driven algorithm, it's imperative to take this into account cc: @betashop.eth
10 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

alec.eth is yapping🤠 pfp
alec.eth is yapping🤠
@alec.eth
Tysm for continuing to speak up and risking your reputation to do so
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tony D’Addeo pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
I don't find this skew a problem in and of itself... the autofollow list had the most interesting accounts who were here early and posted into the void for years to build the network up from nothing they earned their following by jumping on a once-in-a-life distribution opportunity the problem would be a capital score algo that *increased* this skew concretely: take 100 accounts that were on the AF list, calculate their % of social capital of the network in both relative and absolute terms if every month of the algo running those % increased then the algo is worthless if every month of the algo running those % decrease then it's good and yes path dependency exists but that's ok bc those early advantages are decaying
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dawufi pfp
dawufi
@dawufi
hey stop it i need more followers for my ego thanks
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
this is the pattern in a certain kind of social media, the high signal / digital soho that eventually goes 'content/creator' ie the clubhouse initial autofollow is where the accounts with millions of followers came from, those accts then got paid to boost rooms etc and it was a race to the bottom re content
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

alex 🎩 pfp
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
I've been wondering what the first influence-driven algo to do this would be none of the Farcaster engagement rankings do it so far, the only data we have on FC is 'autofollow inclusive'
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adam-
I get DM spam offering me ambiguous jobs on the daily due to that list.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

MJC pfp
MJC
@mjc716
yea a valid point. one short term fix could be just using the square root of the current influence score in order to level the playing field
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

y0b pfp
y0b
@y0b
This "early influencers" feedback loop bias gets propagated and reinforced in pretty much all algos. I'm glad the auto-follow is gone, even if just for the fact now I can continue to onboard people without them complaining their feed is full of stuff they don't care about and leaving shortly after.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

snail pfp
snail
@snail
ego patting virgins will gatekeep anything they can, don't worry about that geoff.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

QfnvTR pfp
QfnvTR
@mhqwedr
heynnstop itnni need more followers for my egonnthanks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

VuWWwieoe pfp
VuWWwieoe
@kykpnzh
I worked hard on unfollowing many of that auto follow accounts that i didn;t find interesting..
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Icetoad @ETHDenver 🍕 🎩 pfp
Icetoad @ETHDenver 🍕 🎩
@icetoad.eth
Agreed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

not_not_Duna 🍖➰ pfp
not_not_Duna 🍖➰
@imduna.eth
I worked hard on unfollowing many of that auto follow accounts that i didn;t find interesting..
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction