Tony D’Addeo pfp

Tony D’Addeo

@deodad

740 Following
9037 Followers
Tony D’Addeo pfp
25 replies
8 recasts
56 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
0 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
LLMs have made it possible to work on more things at once I used to run a single tmux session with 5-10 windows, one for each repo I was working in at any given time each window would have 1 large pane that served as my editor and then 2-4 stacked panes on a column to the right, something like 1 for executing shell commands, 1 running a dev server, 1 running a sql console with LLMs it's useful to have 1-2 panes with a Claude Code CLI running on the same screen as my editor, so now I run less frequently used things like the dev server / sql or node consoles in their own window so I have editor + shell + 1-2 LLM terminals in one window and processes / consoles in another additionally I'm now using git worktrees to have copies of repos so that I always have a clean main to do quick fixes of off without having to gwip my feature branches, LLMs have made this more important since there are more opportunities to parallelize work the result is that I now have something like 10-20 windows and for the first time I'm using multiple tmux sessions to provide an additional level in the hierarchy I can get to any other window in a session with two keystrokes and if I need to navigate to another session I ended up using the interactive switcher
4 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
13 replies
2 recasts
39 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
4 replies
0 recast
16 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
1 reply
0 recast
16 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
4 replies
1 recast
28 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
6 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
11 replies
14 recasts
69 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
6 replies
2 recasts
37 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
Why doesn't Farcaster use OAuth 2.0 like other social platforms? Farcaster is built on a decentralized architecture whereas OAuth is build to establish trust between 3 separate parties. Breaking this down: - in Farcaster users own their identity and authenticate via a cryptographic signature without an intermediary; in OAuth a centralized services own the identity and a user has to request that 1st party authenticate them to the 3rd party app for devs: SIWF / Quick Auth = OAuth Sign In - in Farcaster the data is public and replicated, anyone can permissionlessly access the data via the Snapchain network; in OAuth your data is controlled by a single entity and applications need to request permissions to access to data, subject to the platforms approvals and limits (e.g. X charges $5k+++ for data access) for devs: Snapchain / infra providers like Neynar = OAuth APIs accessible with a Bearer token
1 reply
5 recasts
24 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
1 reply
1 recast
13 reactions
Tony D’Addeo pfp
2 replies
6 recasts
36 reactions