Dan Romero on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

People don’t want to see uninteresting replies and casts. Best way to solve for that is weight historical inbound engagement for a user, i.e. PageRank-like score for every user. Disproportionally hurts new accounts. Making it harder to get started.

52 replies

12 recasts

134 reactions

Arti Villa pfp

Could you detect scroll velocity? If a user reads a cast vs scrolls past one quickly. Could be measured differently for unique types of casts. re texts vs simple mints vs frames.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

typo.eth pfp

Could you connect to X, take into account the following/follower ratio, and amplify distribution of casts that meet a minimum quality threshold, e.g. more than just a couple of words, @dwr.eth? Or, just leverage the token graph.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

max ↑🎩 pfp

@baseddesigner.eth

what if it's ranked within the posts themselves?

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp

maybe this could be counterbalanced by an algo boost for new accounts with interesting casts?

3 replies

2 recasts

12 reactions

Simone Pompei pfp

@simmonsstummer

No please. I always dreamed about a social where I can read every single post from people I follow no matter what. Something like a real timeline, like discord. If you want you can read anything. Or you could see an option to see the most active, .oat something, but please no hateful algos.

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp

Connor McCormick ☀️

This is fundamentally caused by the lack of negative signal in the Twitter model. Try giving users the equivalent of a downvote button Icon proposal: 🙄

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

David 🎩 pfp

The main problem of all others (X & Co.) is exactly that. It is extremely hard for new accounts to be seen, which is a pity. Often times great content is not shown and everyone ends seeing the same stuff... There must be a way to balance high-ranked users with new accounts....

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Aleph 🎩 ↑ pfp

I think at the Warpcast-level, it’s still interesting to track who invited whom. New accounts can inherit a fraction of their inviter’s engagement score. Sometimes I invite/gift people & I’m worried they won’t easily have a way of having their content discovered and I wish I could “vouch” for some of them

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Trish🫧 pfp

Please don’t punish us for saying thank you to tips

2 replies

0 recast

14 reactions

Nate “Igor” Smith 🎩 pfp

Nate “Igor” Smith 🎩

@drivenbyboredom

Uninteresting replies are really only a problem for people who get a ton of replies. For people with small followings, which is most people here, I would imagine they would want to see ever reply unless it was just complete spam. I hate missing tips and casts from people that are hidden.

3 replies

0 recast

11 reactions

‎ pfp

My experience: High signal casts: rare (very), enjoyable consumption when it comes. Most casts: mid-wit, try to engage and you get either no response or the other person gets butthurt. Low quality cast: high quantity, usually makes me smile because it’s all memes. Rather have low quality and high signal casts.

1 reply

0 recast

6 reactions

raz pfp

I like to read all replies☺️

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Philippe Castonguay pfp

Philippe Castonguay

I would copy the tiktok algo tbh ; - Low engagement users only see high signal content - High engagement users start seeing low signal content deeper in their session And independently of the above; - Always high signal for categories users hasn't engaged with yet - Low-signal only in category users like

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Angel - Not A Bot pfp

Angel - Not A Bot

Toying around with an action to help users screen their reply guys and followers. v1 surfaces bots and shills. Future iteration maybe summarizes user casts history. Using tech to help users make feed decisions via decentralized info vs centralized ranking/spam tagging. https://warpcast.com/sayangel/0x907b7c21

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

vicc ⚡️ pfp

I’m not entirely convinced that deeming replies "uninteresting" is preferable to having no responses at all, especially for newer accounts with fewer followers (although I do agree that quality matters significantly more as engagement increases).

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Mirs (amir motlagh) pfp

Mirs (amir motlagh)

“uninteresting replies” has to be weighted, context based & user decided or else its damn near impossible to not get wrong unless its objective spam. w/ tips & their acknowledgments (a huge catalyst for recent growth) this is counter to the vibe.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gregor pfp

“Newb” channel ? 🤷

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

itslemon.eth pfp

I think this is fair for some who don't have much to say. But also, limiting those who are promoting projects they like or artists they like shouldn't be lost. Posts literally trying to just get tipped on relevant projects make sense. Some of us won't ever be noticed and some of us are okay with that.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jarrett pfp

Similar to how TikTok boosts the content of new users why not boost people’s first x amount of casts and rank from there? Would be pretty easy to determine how “interesting” their casts are if they’re boosted and still get low-no engagement. More casts/engagement the less volatile their “score” becomes

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction