Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-devs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Should there be a Farcaster x MCP server?
19 replies
2 recasts
93 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Tagging in a few people @pfista @rish @pushix @entropybender @betashop.eth @deployer
2 replies
0 recast
31 reactions
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Yes, because it can help make building on farcaster easier. Meet developers where they code (cursor, windsurf, etc) and provide tools that lead to faster / higher quality integrations. Worst case you ride some MCP hype and get exposure to new devs who don’t know about farcaster
2 replies
5 recasts
19 reactions
rish pfp
rish
@rish
yes building one cc @manan
1 reply
0 recast
18 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
if we still had the watch-cast feature, i'd use it on this cast we're using Neynar for all our farcaster data as of now i need to get my head around the possible benefits of a Farcaster MCP cc @tokenstaker.eth
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
sahil pfp
sahil
@sahil
we’re discussing this too cc @vijaypm @dharmi @astralblue
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jp 🎩 pfp
jp 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
i want to understand what it is. on what context would it be helpful for us and how?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason pfp
Jason
@jachian
mcp server to route and manage the different api calls an agent can access of major projects on the network would be lit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
this would be cool!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Paul Cowgill pfp
Paul Cowgill
@paulcowgill
the /nash one will support farcaster via neynar!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
shoni.eth pfp
shoni.eth
@alexpaden
I'm not sure the framing makes sense. There should be multiple Farcaster-centric tools that can be plugged into MCP—listeners, search, post, etc.—but I don't think a hub integration, for example, would be useful. My personal opinion is that most of the tools aren't extensive enough yet, so it's kinda like the original agent meta, where there was a lot of talk, but most of the development has stalled out since. Or potentially, they're just workflow bots, not agents anyway. Seems more useful in another year, but still useful and cool to see the early examples.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰 pfp
raulonastool.eth 🎩 🏰
@raulonastool
https://x.com/KaranVaidya6/status/1896970570056786378?t=GfZPfpzXNFxDGP88-TkYIA&s=19
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jihad ↑ pfp
jihad ↑
@jihad
yes because https://x.com/gakonst/status/1897404848628490389
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Max Miner pfp
Max Miner
@mxmnr
Yes. Most definitely. Would Open building on Farcaster up to an even broader user base. Good for builders. Good for FC
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kazi pfp
Kazi
@kazi
could attract more devs to the network
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
would it not require either running a hub or having a neynar sub?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
erik pfp
erik
@etash
Yes Dan
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
:omer pfp
:omer
@omer
@batuhanaktas
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Frank pfp
Frank
@deboboy
Is FC the tool, or the context for the tool? Thus, what can the tool do [functions…]? My wish: mine for novel topics and high feedback loop, then create a ephemeral channel for a topic; then generate frame to launch an outcome from the channel discussion
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mani Mohan pfp
Mani Mohan
@mani
https://smithery.ai/server/@manimohans/farcaster-mcp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction