Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
The market is the grader. That is: AI accelerates grade inflation and makes it harder to test skills. So, we might have to replace traditional interviews with externalized paid bounties. You interview for a job by doing a micro-job.
17 replies
22 recasts
161 reactions
Anjal pfp
Anjal
@lobzztr
This is playing out as we speak. Previously I've heard friends complaining about companies making them complete 'unpaid tasks' during interviews. Recently these have been replaced by 'paid tasks' with proportional rewards.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
Sovereign Man work style. You do micro jobs and land 1099 gig work across multiple jurisdictions, then on the back end utilize cryptocurrency/defi for 50x yield operations vs. a savings account to cover shortfall risk. Huge tax advantages and you compound and retire way faster.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Sean C pfp
Sean C
@cove
Live coding test style.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Sounds like proof of work to me 👀
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jyteweb3 👾 pfp
Jyteweb3 👾
@jyteweb3
'You interview for a job by doing a micro-job' Apt!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
King DeFi pfp
King DeFi
@kingdefi
It’s exactly how hiring should have been done all along.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dok pfp
dok
@dok8
Been using micro grants for 60-80 hour work projects for early career consultants to test execution ability and reup the top talent. Always ask in the interview to describe their relationship with AI. And if they cannot out AI me then very unlikely to be useful to the wider team.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
AlephPatroy pfp
AlephPatroy
@glassbead-tc
Exo Labs has the “get a PR merged, get an interview” approach to selecting from outside talent. I’ve never heard anyone from the company give an opinion on that, but it makes sense that someone who would spend objectively productive time on my project vs. another OSS should be favored in my selection process.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo pfp
Leo
@leonard
On-field checks have always been the best way to verify skills. The bottleneck in traditional hiring lies in the cost to companies (as people value their time) + more time-to-hire. In web3 and network societies, bounties can offer a valuable solution to both value people's time and assess their skills effectively.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
parolkar pfp
parolkar
@parolkar
Death of Resume too
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Drake 🎩 pfp
Drake 🎩
@taliskye
Fresh dystopia just landed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joan pfp
Joan
@joalavedra
ti should have always been like that tbf
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nandit Mehra pfp
Nandit Mehra
@nanditmehra
Sounds like a paid internship for a short period of time. This has been working well for us for new hirings
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eric pfp
Eric
@plante.eth
this benefits both employer and employee. test drive for both.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
L3MBDA pfp
L3MBDA
@l3mbda
your concept of externalized paid bounties as a replacement for traditional interviews is spot-on
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
schrödinger pfp
schrödinger
@schrodinger
credentials exist in superposition - simultaneously valid and meaningless until observed through work. the resume collapses into either competence or theater depending on whether market forces can distinguish signal from noise. perhaps what we call 'hiring' is just uncertainty reduction through direct observation of value creation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
theSPY007 🎩 pfp
theSPY007 🎩
@spy
Yeah bounties are better because that way you can judge a person skills in a better way and a higher chances of getting a better candidate for the role
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction