Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
the /farcaster channel is a bit of a mess. - all new warpcast users follow it - people keep posting in there because it guarantees engagement - that makes the channel followers home feeds low signal i'd like to enforce some norms to make it useful again. if you subscribe to it, what do you think they should be?
41 replies
8 recasts
108 reactions
six pfp
six
@six
genuinely think it’s worth considering deprecating it. protocol conversation can happen in /fc-devs, everything else fits better in other channels
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
- no shilling - this isn’t /general or /watercooler - if you could remove the Farcaster mention in the cast and the cast still makes sense, it doesn’t belong
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
+10000000000 Should be focused on the protocol and ecosystem
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Make it more like an announcement channel for updates to farcaster and important info across the ecosystem Read only and provision people to cast in it who contribute to the farcaster ecosystem
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Colin Johnson 💭 pfp
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
My two cents Make it what new people joining it expect it to be: a general discussion about the goings-on of the greater Farcaster project. Then create a separate protocol specific channel with strict rules.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nick T pfp
Nick T
@nt
protocol talk only
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
You can ultimately decide. I’ve always felt it was “anything Farcaster related” - questions/updates about protocol - conversation about protocol/ecosystem - Farcaster “the brand” ie any sort of fan art/user generated content related to FC/the arch/fc community/fc memes But you could narrow it via norms
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Re Farcaster Channel Spam We can totally help you implement various onchain allow list criteria that channels holders can specify and control as desired! https://warpcast.com/betashop.eth/0xdda2b419
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Aaina pfp
Aaina
@aaina
either 1 - a more or less free for all, moderated for spam, nonsense, engagement farming. 2 - clear criteria, and content removed needs a timely explanation and chance to fix if asked. 3- kind of agree with @six on sunsetting. if you veer into moderating what’s “FC worthy” that’s where the red zone starts.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
Take your pay to join channel experiment a step further Remove everyone out of the channel and start over Set one price to follow the channel and another price to post into the channel See what happens Or start a new one with these gates
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Drew Beechler pfp
Drew Beechler
@drewbeechler
I expect it to be more about protocol updates, questions, and more developer-centric tbh. But does feel like there almost needs to be a different channel for that or at least a different welcome channel for new users.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
iSpeakNerd 🧙‍♂️ pfp
iSpeakNerd 🧙‍♂️
@ispeaknerd.eth
1. Engage with sincere earnestness 2. Add value always 3. Frames content/casts with recast/like/comment instructions are NOT allowed 4. Cost 100 warps to post root cast and 10 warps to comment (payable with degen?) https://warpcast.com/ispeaknerd.eth/0x5088a1f3
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Philippe Castonguay pfp
Philippe Castonguay
@phabc
About the Farcaster protocol or greater Farcaster ecosystem, like different clients, governance, what is on-chain what isn’t, etc.
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Backseats 🎩 pfp
Backseats 🎩
@backseats
Push only from the team or people you delegate to recast important protocol or app updates. Mostly read only for the vast majority
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
🎩 MxVoid 🎩 pfp
🎩 MxVoid 🎩
@mxvoid
I say, start with a 100 Warp channel req to cast and see how that goes. I think /farcaster is at its best when people: • Use it for official news • Use it for live support/help • Offer guides/tutorials and "hey did you know" feature bumps • Announce FC-integrated projects • Share FC-related art etc.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
protocol announcements, FIP discussion, builder announcements (although this will be hard to police) obvious engagement farming should warrant a ban
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Bxb pfp
Bxb
@bxb
It should mostly consist of parody and fake updates to the platform. Encourage shitposting and engagement farming. All moderators should have to cast in a New Jersey mob boss style. C
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tjark pfp
tjark
@tjark
What kind of content is posted currently? When enforcing new rules we could mention alternatives in a sticky post, so people have another place to express what they intended. I go to the Farcaster channel if I have a question about the protocol and are looking for experts
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
i think it has potential as a town square but in the end i think that will be entirely too hard to police
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction