Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Todd Goldberg pfp
Todd Goldberg
@todd
The client and protocol used to have the same name -- Farcaster. I think the client should have kept the name Farcaster and the protocol should have been named Warpcast. The Farcaster meme is just too strong (even back then) and is usually first touchpoint for new users (instead they have to learn about Warpcast).
15 replies
3 recasts
29 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso ⌁ pfp
Gabriel Ayuso ⌁
@gabrielayuso.eth
Good that the meme is the protocol and not the first popular client.
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Ash Egan pfp
Ash Egan
@ash
I’m guilty of using Farcaster for normies
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Henri Stern Ꙫ pfp
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
I used to agree -- but I've made my peace w it. Happy to have protocol primacy even though I agree the client will drive early on!
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
I think if they called it something as unsexy as SMTP or TCP IP or FTP then we wouldn’t have all this confusion. But it wouldn’t be as fun Are there any popular protocols with a sexy memetic name besides farcaster?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Alec Urtu pfp
Alec Urtu
@alecurtu
Im still calling it the purple app.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cmiley pfp
Cmiley
@cmiley14
Agreed! "Farcaster" is iconic atp. New users search for that name so keeping the it for the client would make it smoother to discover & share. also, re-naming the protocol would have been fine since developers have to read documentation & learn new definitions anyway. These are good problems to have though, ig :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
I’m not sure about that. Learning about Warpcast is learning about Farcaster.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nawaz Ahmed pfp
Nawaz Ahmed
@nawaz
Just had this chat with a friend today, have to introduce people to farcaster and then tell them about warpcast to use it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brian Harrington pfp
Brian Harrington
@brainharrington
Agreed the client having a different name is rough was thinking that today
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
obvious pfp
obvious
@obvious
Better that the protocol has the better name. It aligns with the values that protocol is stronger than individual apps. Not that this is an app which happens to share it’s protocol. WWW outlived mosaic, netscape, ie etc. People back then atleast grasped that in order to access the network you needed some browser.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tom pfp
Tom
@tom49
Agreed 🤝🏻
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manu pfp
Manu
@manu8
I've heard ppl to this day saying send me a Gmail. So I think we'll be alright 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kianga.eth pfp
kianga.eth
@fhomoney
I really like Farcaster as the protocol name. It's more descriptive of the permanence/immutability of what users own. We can go FAR. Warpcast is all like - we're the sexy best-in-show app that gets you going FAR >> FASTER. The difference here is a new concept for normies in Web2, well captured by the names as they are.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Majaharul Afran pfp
Majaharul Afran
@majaharul
Go go
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wahyu pfp
Wahyu
@warifp
Well deserved! Follow me for friendship experiences.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction