Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
24 recasts
127 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
instead of person A, B + C casting about topic Y in their own siloes (which happens), it’d be better — for them and for the network — if A, B, C casted in one place and engaged w/ each other. Bluesky, TikTok algo etc. make it easy to discover discussions on specific topics. hard here, so topics don’t grow.
5 replies
9 recasts
54 reactions
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
/coffee had nailed this for awhile with @jpetrich and @drewcoffman.eth /nfl or /nba feels like it had good core group with @bracketgame also leading the charge other suggestions: - @christin, @keccers.eth, @anisha, me around “women health tech” - anybody coding groups
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
phil pfp
phil
@phil
Tried with /groupchat Really need one person who is dedicated to keeping it thriving @sriramk.eth has a good cut on this: https://sriramk.com/group-chats-rule-the-world
1 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
feels like this is a groupchat. 3-5 people in one groupchat works best as UI. You aren't guaranteed to see the messages in an algo feed and going to channel is extra effort vs opening the groupchat in your usual message app
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Because none of my friends are going to pay $5 to use Twitter but with only 1000 people. The issue is onboarding. People just say nah. This is the real issue. There is no incentive to get normal people on here. Until they subsidize growth and attack churn like a SaaS would then it’s just gonna be the same 1000 people casting at each other everyday like it is now.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Joe Petrich 🟪 pfp
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
I will say I've searched on Farcaster to see if there's a channel for something (Blueprint) and, not finding anything, decided not to cast about it because I doubted I'd get any interesting responses. Is it easy to create a channel these days?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Ivy pfp
Ivy
@ivy
this sounds like the public/private clubhouse-like group chat @erik and I think @dwr.eth discussed at one point why wouldn't they just create a group chat for it instead?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
I think because this type of conversation/group works better in group chats. Needs some privacy to create connections.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
Doesn’t this naturally happen anyway where people form collectives, orgs, etc and start posting under that umbrella and themselves?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cyber Shakti 🎩😇😈💃 pfp
Cyber Shakti 🎩😇😈💃
@cybershakti
Channels are not permissionless at the moment as confirmed by @dwr.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dutchess.Base.eth👑💰🐉 pfp
Dutchess.Base.eth👑💰🐉
@dutchess
Don't group creation cost warps? If I'm correct then I'm going to say that's why. Firstly because why should I pay to create a group on an app I already paid to be a part of and secondly the warps system is very much broken and has been for quite a while. My advance apologies for my ignorance if I'm wrong about the cost.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DV pfp
DV
@degenveteran.eth
That's what @zwillow @janicka @theonlycakeone and @podom.eth and I have started doing recently. The thought which I discussed recently was that Small communities and channels need to join up and be a bigger group consisting of multiple channels (what the difference between 100k channel and 10 10k channels as long as it's different people) I'm here to help others if they need that growth help or just mentorship to give them that push to finally make their own channel etc. To me it's not hard finding people. It's building that trust with new people that you don't "know". It just takes time.
2 replies
2 recasts
2 reactions
jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdl
précisément. was working on this exact thing today
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
cc @matthew /wireframe
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
@ccarella.eth just convinced me to try to revive /open-source-ai https://warpcast.com/noun839.eth/0x32343c50
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin Basche pfp
Benjamin Basche
@basche42
I’ve been toying around with Tinder for Friends as a Farcaster frame
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Maybe we need a "Make a channel from discussion thread" button that invites everyone in the thread and maybe seeds the initial conversation. Not sure if lots of tiny channels is best but worth a try.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kia pfp
kia
@kia
channel (not chat)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wisdomlego pfp
wisdomlego
@daniel-hurley
You just spawned it. I am an avid self-hoster. I get around this by knowing networks very well and crafting them to fit my needs. Where I lack in software skills, I for sure make up for them in the network access I give them and the rich connectivity. My network, my applications, my rules. With that said, would anyone be interested in forming a channel to share and learn about self hosting and creating private networks?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction