Farcaster

why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? 

it could:
1. amplify reach (shared audiences)  
2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort)
3. build deeper connections  

maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

instead of person A, B + C casting about topic Y in their own siloes (which happens), it’d be better — for them and for the network — if A, B, C casted in one place and engaged w/ each other.

Bluesky, TikTok algo etc. make it easy to discover discussions on specific topics. hard here, so topics don’t grow.

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

I don't think topic discovery is good anywhere. Hashtags resort to slop pretty quickly.

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

that’s a group chat for friends. i’m talking about building a community around a shared interest, more like subreddits or substack groups or Facebook groups.

I wanted this for my friends but I also want it private and it would be better if it was free (since alternatives on WhatsApp/telegram are free and better for chatting)

naive

patchwork model: Decision makers, Views, Models, Patches, Agent set
editor software: File tabs, Editors, Tracks, Media items, FX
FC clients: Hosts or browsers, Pages, Casts, Data, ?

in the former two, something calls Agents to do things
in FC clients, nothing calls agents to do things

why?

im doing this without the formalism. just tag

sorry I’m not getting it. What’re you doing?

im doing this without the formalism. just tag https://warpcast.com/na/0x981042c3

tbh i’ve lost track of “how channels are supposed to be used”