Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
Did the recent SEC defeat by Ripple positively impact how you think about crypto? 1. Yes, this will kick off a new era of building 2. Yes, things are somewhat brighter 3. Neutral 4. No, this was overhyped 5. No, this was negative Question by @cojo.eth https://i.imgur.com/WvpeDqL.png
16 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions

Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
When submitting your vote: βœ… put your option # first βœ… add additional comments after your chosen # πŸ‘ follow me to see results
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin Johnson πŸ’­ pfp
Colin Johnson πŸ’­
@cojo.eth
1. The market is back down, but I think this outcome created new fundamental legal precedent that will be far reaching. LFG.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alex Palmer pfp
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
3. It's not a defeat and that's not how federal courts work. It's another outcome that's (at this current moment in time) directionality positive for crypto, but no regulation has been updated or changed.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

matt πŸ’­ pfp
matt πŸ’­
@matthewmorek
3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LEA 🎩 pfp
LEA 🎩
@leaolmos.eth
4. Crypto will always prevale, doesn't matter what SEC or any government have to say about it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

bradq pfp
bradq
@bradq
3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
2. more challenges ahead before we enter the bull. builders will keep buidling.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ben Adamsky πŸ’­ pfp
Ben Adamsky πŸ’­
@ba
4 I think it's a good narrative, but doesn't actually mean much just yet since the SEC is still so unclear on what they want to do about most coins
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

moreReese pfp
moreReese
@morereese
3. Although I think it's a win for the crypto industry, it didn't really affect how I think about crypto personally
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

humpty pfp
humpty
@humpty
2 fundamentally things are the same but there’s now precedent for change, regulation wise.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joe Toledano pfp
Joe Toledano
@joetoledano
3. (Not a lawyer and this is not advice, rather conjecture at best) Hesistant to say its positive because there was nothing indicative to me of a ruling on the token itself as a security but rather its distribution. Was good to see that the process of 'blind' matching of buyer/sellers was not an IC though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

notdevin  pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
3. I dunno, gut feeling. I don’t think anything matters as much as making things that work for users. There are plenty of products built from companies with regulated security offerings, there are plenty of products built from companies that don’t have regulated security offerings
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zachary pfp
Zachary
@z4ch4ry
3 Whole thing is a show anyway
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction