Ponder Surveys on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ponder Surveys pfp

Given the current state of AI, what is your p(doom)? 1. 0% 2. 1-10% 3. 11-20% 4. 21-50% 5. 50%+ Inspired by @notdevin.eth https://i.imgur.com/abLoGsW.png

23 replies

2 recasts

4 reactions

Ponder Surveys pfp

When responding: 1️⃣ Put your option # first 2️⃣ Add comments after 3️⃣ Join the Ponder channel to stay informed ⭐️ Want to earn @ponder rewards for your answers? Visit https://weponder.io and grab a pass

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ponder Surveys pfp

The survey results are in! https://warpcast.com/survey/0x578c

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Alex Palmer pfp

@thatalexpalmer.eth

2. It occurs to me that some folks out there seem to be projecting their own bullshit onto the potential dangers (and capabilities) of AI.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

notdevin pfp

2. The current state of AI is less than a toaster and nothing has indicated nearly as much progress as has been hyped. This is fine because what we have is super useful. The only time it seems close to alive is if you make the mistake of anthropomorphizing it. Well It, isn’t thinking ever, it’s just word patterns

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Colin Johnson 💭 pfp

Colin Johnson 💭

3. I have a lot of faith in humanity, there’s just such a massive array of things that can go wrong that we have yet to imagine.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Alberto Ornaghi pfp

Alberto Ornaghi

1. P(doom caused by AI) = 0% P(doom caused by some egocentric tyrant) > 50%

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Chris pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Mantej Rajpal 🇺🇸 pfp

Mantej Rajpal 🇺🇸

2 GPT4 et al are great automation tools, and image generation and recognition is dope, but we haven’t seen much that would imply doom or hostile AI takeover

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Gabriel Ayuso pfp

@gabrielayuso.eth

5 No timeframe or source of doom were given.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

sean pfp

2. depends on the human creators

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

🤷🚂👲🧑‍🤝‍🧑 pfp

🤷🚂👲🧑‍🤝‍🧑

2 I don't think there's any version of p(doom) that proves the near-certainty that any misaligned party, using current SOTA, can create a certain range of possibilities where p(fait accompli doom within # of steps) is likelier. most preexisting p(doom) are near-infinitesimal slices w/o feedback priced in. not 0%, yet.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Chukwuka Osakwe pfp

Chukwuka Osakwe

@chukwukaosakwe

5. Colin is going to say I'm a doomer (and maybe I am), but really I just want to live through a Terminator-esque period if I can. 😂😂

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Steve pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

TommyJo pfp

# - first ponder answer I'm stumped by. Would be a lie if I put a number down as my brain can't even start to rationalize all the moving parts

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

freeboy pfp

2.I always maintain optimism towards new things, and optimism is always good.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

kripcat.eth 🎩 pfp

kripcat.eth 🎩

2. Depends on your definition of Doom though. I think we’re far from the Singularity and not convinced LLMs will get us there. But the tech as it stands today could still prove sufficiently disruptive in the context of other existential threats to push us over the edge.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Cartographer 🎩 pfp

Cartographer 🎩

2. Humanity will overcome the ebbs and flows of any AI misuse over the coming decades. Even if a doom scenario occurs in some people's eyes, humanity will grow through it or around it and find equilibrium again.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Bruno🎩 pfp

3. Exciting times ahead, the forces at work for the better which always comes with bad actors, but overall, mentally believe in massive growth.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Gökhan Turhan pfp

1. The biggest p(doom) are incompetent people who are the key decision-making positions. These people are famous for indavertent domestic accidents. They also happen to kill whilst driving.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction