Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
robin :•> pfp
robin :•>
@robin
understand this is a common request. we relentlessly cut scope to ship the app in a few weeks poll: what would you prefer? 1) being able to connect with a wallet you own (EOA), and signing every transaction with that wallet app (would require you to switch apps regularly) 2) being able to *mint to* your personal wallet, but use your smart wallet to sign transactions to avoid app-switching
43 replies
11 recasts
133 reactions
Ayo Of Asgard pfp
Ayo Of Asgard
@ayomide.eth
Option 1 works for me for every app, I don't want to own another wallet for every new app I use.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
silv pfp
silv
@silv.eth
Avoid app switching always. As long as there is a way eventually to consolidate all these smart wallets from a UX standpoint it’s all about less friction for new users (not existing MetaMask OGs)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Saadiq pfp
Saadiq
@saadiq
Hold the line. I fought creating a new wallet because I was lazy. Having done it, it’s just better. Do we care about onboarding mainstream audiences or no? I’m now leaning towards stripping out support for EOAs in my WIP project.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
elle pfp
elle
@riotgoools
i already had a smart wallet so i didn't need to create a wallet but #2 would be nice bc i can't seem to connect my smart wallet to share moshis on gallery (yet?) ^-^
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
2. Though I would like to mention that the constant tab-switching and having to verify my Face ID / passkey for my newly created smart wallet almost entirely negates the UX benefit of it in the first place
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
artiom pfp
artiom
@artiom
2! w/ an option to save the "mint to" address, so there's no need to enter it every time
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Midas pfp
Midas
@midas
Option 2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jake pfp
Jake
@jklb.eth
Very 2 1 will take more normie education, and 2 will probably require some reeducation/docs to support crypto doofs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex pfp
alex
@alexgrover.eth
1, I’d prefer not to have to load funds into a new wallet
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Armstrong 🎩🔵 pfp
Armstrong 🎩🔵
@karimi
option 1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rob pfp
rob
@robertfelt.eth
i like idea 2! how would that work though? would you have to some how connect your personal wallet to ur signing wallet?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grant 🌈 🎩 🐸 pfp
grant 🌈 🎩 🐸
@grunt.eth
It would be nice to sign in with another wallet to collect your collections at the least!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tombornal pfp
tombornal
@tombornal
1 cuz im used to it, but would love to try option 2 i generated a new smart wallet and then kind of instantly regretted it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alina 🎩 ⚡️ 🎭 :•> pfp
Alina 🎩 ⚡️ 🎭 :•>
@alinaya
I'm for option 1, it installed for me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gökhan 🧬💾🚀 pfp
Gökhan 🧬💾🚀
@gokhan.eth
1. under any case.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
priyanka 🦉 pfp
priyanka 🦉
@priyanka
2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
2
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Micah pfp
Micah
@micah
1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louis 👵 🎩🔮 pfp
Louis 👵 🎩🔮
@superlouis.eth
There’s a middle ground. You can sign once an approval or a session for the embedded wallet to transact on the behalf of your main wallet. You wouldn’t have to sign every single transaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction