Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š

@superlouis.eth

671 Following
2402 Followers


Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
My worst fear happened last night. After 677 days since my last proposal, I got an opportunity, and my node missed it. Trying not to rage-quit the solo staking game, let's figure out what wen wrong: - No missing attestation, I usually get alerts when I miss attestation and go fix it. I wrongly assumed that healthy attestations meant healthy validator. - Nimbus version 24.12.0 (dappnode package 1.0.16, only 3 weeks late from the "medium-urgency" update) - No errors in the logs. Only a casual warning: "Block could not be sent from validator that is also managed by the beacon node" Looking into the log history, it turns out a similar warning appeared for attestations as well: "A validator client has attempted to send an attestation from validator that is also managed by the beacon node" I mean what the f* is this supposed to mean? Upgraded Nimbus to the latest version (no config change). Warnings are gone. See you in 2 years.
10 replies
23 recasts
116 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
I'm a Builder-Decentralist (-8.9, -4.5) on the Onchain Alignment Chart! Check out your position:
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Denver is called « the Mile High City », but not for the reason they claim it is.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
I have always been amazed by the safety of American outlets.
3 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
On my way to Denver! Hit me up if you want to meet somewhere
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
I was wondering the same thing. Are they all legit?
1 reply
3 recasts
2 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
The YO notifications make me feel like I’m popular. And throw me back 10 years ago.
1 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Interesting. Fun fact: there’s a project that has been developing in the past few months and was backed by Vitalik: it’s a superfast and super cheap L2 called MegaETH. They’re very active on x and discord but I don’t see a lot of people talking about it outside of it. Has anyone an opinion about it?
3 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
We're doing it wrong. This is a hot take: I don't think legacy wallet UX is a problem (as long as you stay away from metamask). None of the crypto-noobs I've onboarded had issues with writing down a seed phrase and signing transactions. The "signature popup fear" is unfounded. People like to get a confirmation when they are doing something, especially with the strong commitment that comes with blockchains. If people don't want to create/use a wallet to use your product, the wallet is not the problem, your product is. Yet we are trying so hard to make web3 look like web2. And people hate creating and logging in their web2 accounts (I've been locked out of my google account more often than any wallet that I own). Today I have passkeys and embedded wallets all over the place, and every time I'm prompted to login I have no idea if I'm logging in to the right account or creating a new one. An example of today, trying to sign in my Bracket account:
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
I've been wondering: are there agents able to prove the authenticity of their messages? (i.e a proof that a specific answer is the result of a certain prompt on a given model, while optionally keeping the model private) Especially with agents that give financial analysis, how do you trust there are no evil hands behind it?
3 replies
2 recasts
8 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Aaaand we're live! https://edenonline.ubisoft.com/ Reveal your ID Card now πŸ”₯
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Bitcoin reaches $100k and the french gov collapses. Comme par hasard!
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Forever bullish on ETH https://x.com/timjrobinson/status/1851222337787740425
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Hello dear Monique friends! Okay, okay. it took way longer than expected to announce the new Monique. Let's start with the cool update: ENS integration is dope: you can resolve any mnemonic with the addr.id suffix (it's also a new name I'm considering). This is huge, it means that you can already use mnemonics inside any wallet or explorer that supports ENS! Now the other (less cool) update: I'm hoping to build a more efficient naming algorithm and I need your help. I started a discussion on the Ethereum Magicians forum on the challenge of using a checksum and reducing the space of available mnemonics. So far I haven't found a satisfying solution. With the current 4-bit checksum and bip39 wordlist there are "only" 500M addresses that can fit in 3 words. That will not be enough if I want to include L2 addresses in the longer term. https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/short-mnemonics-for-addresses/21279 If you're interested in the discussion, or know someone, let me know!
1 reply
3 recasts
1 reaction

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Remember when HBO claimed they identified Satoshi?
5 replies
0 recast
15 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Recently I've been receiving countless emails from various sources saying there has been a data breach/leak of my personal data. And they always say "don't worry, no credit card information has been stolen, only your name, address, phone number, etc..". It's worse! 😭
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Is there (or is someone working on) a new URI scheme like https:// or ipfs:// but for smart contract reads? Something like caip://chain/contract/function?params That would be cool @pedrouid.eth
3 replies
2 recasts
0 reaction

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
What I love about writing smart contract code is the guaranteed atomicity of transactions. It’s almost impossible to corrupt the storage by not handling exceptions or botching parallel code
2 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
If a billionaire privacy and free-speech mogul doesn't have an escape-and-hide-forever backup plan, then who does?
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š pfp
Louis πŸ‘΅ πŸ¦‡πŸ”Š
@superlouis.eth
Just a quick feedback on the UX with Bonfire: I accidentally bought the onchain viewing tickets twice (and almost a third time) because it doesn't show up in the inventory, and it's hard to get a visual confirmation that I actually own tickets
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction