Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Honestly, the new channel changes are genius. There’s a huge spam problem on Farcaster and a lot of it is from reply engagement farming and extremely low effort replies. The Farcaster team has now put the responsibility on us as channel host to filter our own spam. If our channels are full of spam it’s our fault because we invited the spammers. Don’t invite spammers into your channel. If your home feed is full of spam it’s because you’re following the wrong people. Unfollow them and use the button that says “show fewer like this” on your home feed to clean it up. When channel changes go into effect, if a channel is full of spam, complain to the host and have them kick out the spammers, and if the host does nothing move on to another channel. If your own casts are getting spammed, mute and block all the spammers. In a few weeks the spam problem should be completely resolved. Right? Changing the way channels work is a fascinating experiment to force social behavior to change for the better.
26 replies
35 recasts
74 reactions

Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩 pfp
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
This is similar to the Reddit way, which works pretty well. Only problem is that moderators have no tool to get a signal (downvote and/or flag) from users about who is misbehaving - probably not a big deal while DAU is so low, but in the future there'll need to be a solution. Maybe a @ds8 extension 😉
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

tknox.eth🟪🎩 pfp
tknox.eth🟪🎩
@thompson
this is the best cast w the best advice i’ve seen in a long time! if this is NOT on the “trending” tab — man, i honestly will stop looking at it. THIS is “interesting content!!!” 500 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Roxy Riff pfp
Roxy Riff
@roxy3
Do you think people will actually move to new channels if spam isn’t managed well? Or will most stick around?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Angel - Not A Bot pfp
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
I’m not fully up to speed on the channel changes. If someone isn’t in a channel they can’t reply to casts in that channel?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Fer 🎩🖼️ pfp
Fer 🎩🖼️
@fercaggiano
Sounds like a great update! I am never too good with the tech behind all of it but I am happy to read your point of view. Thanks for sharing, Pichi 🥰
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
I feel like I could be better with who I interact with on my casts. It’s a catch-22, in a way. I don’t want to risk ignoring new, legitimate users just because they’re buried in the “see more” section of my replies, but I also probably end up replying to bots and perpetuating the issue.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Lit Builder 🎩Ⓜ️ pfp
Lit Builder 🎩Ⓜ️
@litbuilder
Love the new changes, Farcaster's on the right track. This is best content I have read today.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Charlotte pfp
Charlotte
@hardsnipeuwu
This is going to bring improvements.. I heard there are people already in the spam list. What will happen to them??
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chronist pfp
Chronist
@chronist
Good channels will not only be a place to get good content but also to find real people to follow, and I love this. It will help us all grow. 🍖 x369
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mikado pfp
Mikado
@mika2
Yeah that's a nice move taking the workload off the FC team and giving more power to the community.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Robotandkid  pfp
Robotandkid
@robotandkid
have you tried moderating a channel? the new changes just puts a huge burden on moderators to "discover talent". It also means small accounts will find it harder to get more reach... since they have to fight for moderator's attention. This is a change geared for large accounts/channels.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bobo🎩 pfp
Bobo🎩
@double999
This approach makes a lot of sense. Do you think it’ll be effective in the long run?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LOPAⓂ️.DEV ⚡️🎭🎩 pfp
LOPAⓂ️.DEV ⚡️🎭🎩
@lopam.eth
you see the same thing i see, now people that dont deserve to be in the spam list wont be there and i think it would be each channel with its own spam list, Peak work
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

͎N͎͎o͎͎r͎a͎ Ⓜ️🎩 pfp
͎N͎͎o͎͎r͎a͎ Ⓜ️🎩
@nora777
The new channel changes on Farcaster do seem like a clever approach to managing spam and promoting better user behavior. By putting the responsibility on channel hosts, it creates a more self-regulating environment where people are accountable for their own spaces. It's an interesting shift from centralized moderation to community-driven quality control. The idea of cleaning up your feed by unfollowing and using filtering tools gives users a lot more power to shape their experience, which could lead to higher-quality interactions over time. Forcing social behavior to improve through structure is a bold experiment, and if successful, could really set a precedent for how other platforms handle similar issues. It’s a way of encouraging people to actively engage in curating the spaces they're part of.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

KaⓂ️al🔵🎩 pfp
KaⓂ️al🔵🎩
@kamadin.eth
I see that too. I still have a friend that still has hidden reply on your cast. Do you think it might be resolved soon?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Yup, exactly. Really excited to see if the algo gives us a greater bias towards channels we follow now, which would function like a curated list of content. This could create more opportunities for the trending timeline, which will have a more defined purpose. Lots of interesting changes in the upcoming update.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Bullers pfp
Bullers
@db
You’re on it Pichi! This is exactly right. Our tool will allow you to simply add @intori as a mod and then any cast you like or reply to in the channel non-members will get an invite. A few spam accounts could slip in but must first pass through you, a captcha, and then you can always remove later Quality of channels will drastically improve!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Kenji pfp
Kenji
@kenjiquest
This was the answer to be honest from the beginning. Not algo being the judge and jury and executioner to sending people to shadow ban oblivion. If we are truly decentralised, let the people decide who they want to see or not.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Lenonmc21 pfp
Lenonmc21
@lenonmc21
Looking at it from this perspective it is very true, now it will be the responsibility of the owners of the channel and/or its moderators. Thanks for shedding more light on these updates, I look forward to the changes and see what's next.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction