sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root / on Warpcast

Content pfp

https://ethereum.org

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root / pfp

sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /

We've fucking lost it. Nobody in their right mind wants over 50 rollups and endless layers that take days to bridge back. What the world wants is one goddamn chain that just works, and that should be Ethereum. No one with a shred of sanity wants to switch networks in M***Mask. No one wants the headache of adding a token manually on another chain because the contract address isn't the same. Bridging is a pain in the ass. What people want is to transact value simply and directly, without all this convoluted bullshit!

26 replies

12 recasts

150 reactions

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp

Uninformed outsiders articulated similar complaints during the early days of the internet. I wrote about this very topic in the upcoming Powerlaw memo. Everything digital is about networks of networks. Friction will be solved for in time.

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Daniel Fernandes pfp

Daniel Fernandes

Using Rabby solves most of this

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Joe Blau 🎩 pfp

10000 $DEGEN — This is the biggest problem in crypto and what I'm trying to solve.

3 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

𝚐𝔪𝟾𝚡𝚡𝟾 pfp

𝚐𝔪𝟾𝚡𝚡𝟾

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

rafa pfp

Would you like freedom of trade? For a small price of 1000 fragmented chains?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

REN2140 pfp

What’s worse is 50 L1s and you should try rabby

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Igor Stadnyk pfp

I feel you, man. The crypto space is a mess right now, no doubt. But folks are hustling to make it smoother - just takes time to get it right.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Christian Montoya 🦊 pfp

Christian Montoya 🦊

We will solve these things at the app layer, the underlying infra will not be an issue for users

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴 pfp

highplains.base.eth 🎩✨🔴

Calm down, it's coming, that will all be abstracted away.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

timdaub pfp

thanks for saying this, honestly we need more candid user feedback like yours, as it informs lower level engineering

0 reply

0 recast

6 reactions

oliver pfp

@oliverk120.eth

Damn bro, have a coffee 😂. I personally like the tradeoffs ethereum took to get to this rollup centric roadmap even though its a bit of a pain in the ass. I use coinbase wallet so never have to manually switch network. If you only care about speed and interop solana is probably pretty good (i never used it myself).

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Zeen Train pfp

Crypto will gain wide adoption when people don’t realize it’s actually crypto hence, low fees is a necessity

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Deployer pfp

Bruh this isn't Twitter

2 replies

0 recast

4 reactions

Kevin pfp

every protocol and product is fast and secure and harnesses unique benefits so with over 50 rollups and endless layers, these powers combined merge into the Power Ranger's Megazord of crypto

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Gasp pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

boymilk pfp

Ethereum wanted rollups and it’s got them. The fact that we have 50 rollups should be considered a success not a failure. Now the next step is abstracting them away. I find it hard to believe that whoever decided on a rollup-centric roadmap did not predict this problem and its solution.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Namax pfp

Use Rabby wallet

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Hughes pfp

It won't be Eth because it stepped away from the best solution to enable a unified, opaque developer and user experience. State sharding.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Rks pfp

I share your frustration but things gonna go wild, Base is printing Millions per month, early inventors on any L2s up multi million gain, point, marks, gold, candid and soon they will run out of words just to sell new L2. parallelEVM, SVM and so on... Look at Monad, everyone is already there from Bankless guys to ScreenshotGCR. so much money by selling idea of scalling Ethereum, expect 1000 more L2s in next year or so

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction