Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom pfp
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
As a user with a Farcaster account, I'd rather see someone's Farcaster username in your app than their ENS. I interact with people's Farcaster username, not their ENS. The namespace more closely associated with online identity and my social graph will win.
20 replies
9 recasts
45 reactions
Kyle McCollom pfp
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
Farcaster will add messaging to the protocol and will win over all other messaging protocols because Farcaster will be the dominant namespace. I want to message your Farcaster username, not your address or ENS. And the spam tooling that solves spam on Farcaster will also solve messaging spam (@neynar).
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
🎣 pfp
🎣
@broke
yeah that makes sense if you're a farcaster user, ENS will always have more users tho so for dapps it makes more sense to integrate it, but yeah why not both (could link your farcaster acc to your ens name too)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
I kind of agree, AND I like the portability of ENS names right now. It’s nice to see the same name across governance/farcaster/mints
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sand.base.eth pfp
sand.base.eth
@sandman
The Farcaster username <> Ethereum address connection is under-utilised rn.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason pfp
Jason
@chaskin.eth
I prefer ENS over Farcaster usernames because they're more secure. Farcaster usernames are controlled by the merkle team and aren't truly owned by users. Once I could switch to ENS, I did
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
ENS is permissionless, Farcaster username isn't. ENS is too complicated and expensive though. We'll figure it out
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
why not both haha
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Paul Cowgill pfp
Paul Cowgill
@paulcowgill
We’re planning to make this an option on /onceupon soon!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
albert pfp
albert
@thatguyintech
such an interesting take
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I don't think we have to choose between the two paths? @dwr.eth isn't the plan already that farcaster names will become accessible as an ENS subdomain via CCIP, similar to how status works/worked with *.stateofus.eth? We're going to get namespace competition via L2s anyway, ENS just makes it interoperable.
3 replies
1 recast
16 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
i wouldn't sleep on cb.id - it's gaining tons of adoption amongst normies And ENS is still very dominant, as example 50% of all ETH Global 2023 attendees have ENS https://warpcast.com/betashop.eth/0xae9e0976
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
krel pfp
krel
@krel
I mostly live in ens world, and farc second, so for me its the opposite
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
(3) And many apps are just making it easy for users to find their Frens across both Farcaster Lens and ENS you can see both FC and Lens in action at explorer.airstack.xyz just type "Kyle"
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
(2) we're seeing many apps move to Universal Contacts or Frens Lists that combine who you know from Farcaster, Lens, who you sent tokens to, and more
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜 pfp
Jason Goldberg Ⓜ️ 💜
@betashop.eth
(1) apps can also give users a choice upon login as to how they want to be known as
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
+1 to this, I have a feeling we’ll start seeing Farcaster expand to other apps and/or show up in place of other identities(like ENS) https://warpcast.com/dylsteck.eth/0xf83b2639
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Agree BUT would like to see option to also display ENS with link to etherscan. Practical reason — then I don’t have to ask if I need the ens to send airdrop etc Another resolve to this would be a way to airdrop to FC name that could drop to connected wallet of choice.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
David pfp
David
@d
For public facing personas and conversation, it will. But on an open permissionless messaging world, exposing you public namespace is the equivalent of publishing your phone number for anyone to message you. It would be weird to have 2-3 Farcaster accounts, whereas a ms wallets are easier to handle
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🐦‍🔥.eth pfp
🐦‍🔥.eth
@fox
What if we could just verify our Ens that way, instead of username change. ensip-15 with recent normalized ens names should be possible then ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction