Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
welter pfp
welter
@fun
πŸ’” goodbye Active Badge πŸ‘‹ hello Reputation new component on FarcasterUserStats.com that accurately assesses if a you should trust a user or not β€” this is based on follows from 60 reputable native Farcaster users that have high reputation
46 replies
19 recasts
211 reactions
welter pfp
welter
@fun
includes, but not limited to: @vitalik.eth @ted @giu @tldr @dwr.eth @v @barmstrong @jacob @greg @cassie @nonlinear.eth @mcbain @ccarella.eth +45 others these are high reputation users that don't just give follows away for free, gaining trust from these people should be a good indicator if a user is trustworthy or not
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
welter pfp
welter
@fun
there's also weights ie. a follow from @balajis.eth (who follows 47 people and has 100k+ followers) is worth more than a follow from @dwr.eth who follows 2500 people (ps. sorry dan ily i just needed an example)
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
welter pfp
welter
@fun
let me emphasize, i made this in an hour, this is far from perfect right now, this is 100% based on follows which isn't great in following releases, i will be factoring in # of engaging casts per week, how often the user is active, how long they've been on farcaster, etc
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
christin pfp
christin
@christin
I did a sampling of folks, and it seems the data is quite extreme, folks are either 100% "excellent" or 0.XX% "poor"..and also, of those who are "poor" in this metric, I would feel a bit hurt to receive such a ranking since it is dependent on friendship with OG users, rather than reflective of quality of contributions.
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
iSpeakNerd πŸ§™β€β™‚οΈ pfp
iSpeakNerd πŸ§™β€β™‚οΈ
@ispeaknerd.eth
Conflicted about this. Nice to see numerical recognition of work I've put in as a non-OG but folks' data is extremely skewed by og or not influence Cool start but def needs more data sources and types, looking forward to seeing it evolve 5555 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ilya pfp
ilya
@ilyat
Not doing so good here πŸ‘€
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
six pfp
six
@six
lets fkin goooooooo
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Satoshi Tomatomoto pfp
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
I like it, but please accept this bribe to tweak the weights more in my favor. 4000 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thibauld pfp
Thibauld
@thibauld
very cool! And I forgive you for my only 82% reputation 😜
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Justin Hunter pfp
Justin Hunter
@polluterofminds
Love to see it!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben pfp
Ben
@benbassler.eth
very cool! 300 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Adamsky πŸ’­ pfp
Ben Adamsky πŸ’­
@ba
built different I guess
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael pfp
Michael
@michael
Do you see this as a precursor to a custom feed algorithm?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
christin pfp
christin
@christin
...and if it helps, my heuristic for following on here is simply: 1. did this person reply something relevant to my cast? πŸ˜… 2. I scroll through their profile page and see if it's casts I would interact with (so if it's memecoin heavy then I don't follow back b/c I have no meaningful contributions to the topic)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CStreet.eth pfp
CStreet.eth
@cstreet
What is this basing reputation on, because I'm ranking lower than that $ticker scam and last I checked, I'm a pretty good human with a solid reputation. I ran my fellow colleagues, some of the top in this ecosystem and they all ranked poor.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Constant pfp
Constant
@constant
I think this will be a great tool for new users the way you describe future improvements in the comments. For older users I think it would be more useful if you could use your most interacted with accounts as the set of reputable users instead. Or maybe you allow people to make public lists of rep users.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Icetoad 🎩 πŸ• 🎢 🐈 πŸ’š pfp
Icetoad 🎩 πŸ• 🎢 🐈 πŸ’š
@icetoad.eth
Basing the reputation score simply on follows from a list FC OGs is limiting
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
blankyname pfp
blankyname
@blankyname
Uhm, okay, I'm 5% guy who didn't pass the test, sadly. But I'm not that bad, i tell ya! Being serious: it is strange to measure ppl reputation score by being friends with ogs. Idk, maybe there should be a "spammy behaviour" criteria or some low-cap stuff like "f4f".
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Site was just working, but when I went to check more users I got "Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information)."
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction