Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

welter pfp
welter
@fun
šŸ’” goodbye Active Badge šŸ‘‹ hello Reputation new component on FarcasterUserStats.com that accurately assesses if a you should trust a user or not ā€” this is based on follows from 60 reputable native Farcaster users that have high reputation
53 replies
23 recasts
117 reactions

christin pfp
christin
@christin
I did a sampling of folks, and it seems the data is quite extreme, folks are either 100% "excellent" or 0.XX% "poor"..and also, of those who are "poor" in this metric, I would feel a bit hurt to receive such a ranking since it is dependent on friendship with OG users, rather than reflective of quality of contributions.
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

christin pfp
christin
@christin
I commend your build speed as usual, just want to point out that the language of "excellent" and "poor" may not be reflect the data presented here, which is more about connection with a selected list of users who were on the platform earlier. And I'm speaking as someone who is 100%/excellent by your calculations šŸ˜…
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Icetoad šŸŽ© šŸ• šŸŽ¶ šŸˆ šŸ’š pfp
Icetoad šŸŽ© šŸ• šŸŽ¶ šŸˆ šŸ’š
@icetoad.eth
I'm somehow 62% which is good? That's a D- when I was in school haha.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

welter pfp
welter
@fun
the ones under 1% is incorrect, just fixed and deployed
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction