fredwilson pfp
fredwilson
@fredwilson.eth
Hi Farcasters. I wrote, and signed, a post about needing to sign everything as AI tools proliferate. https://avc.mirror.xyz/JpTblGUpDMA7SMS6HYdoYgbQE9H_a_wYq330pit_aRU (cc @talia @nonlinear.eth @ccarella.eth )
20 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
that last paragraph (especially the last sentence) is šŸ¤Œ "the human place to do things" šŸ’œ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Arjun Ram pfp
Arjun Ram
@arjunram
Been thinking about this post of yours. 1. Do you believe itā€™s time to bake in identity into the browser along with payments? 2. Otherwise than identify where else can you see Web3 & AI as two sides of the same coin. Aka can you please elaborate. Thank you!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

thebestwallet pfp
thebestwallet
@thebestwallet
agreed here. This is exactly what i tweeted earlier: it will not be possible to know the difference between a post by a human or by an AI. however transaction signing can *also* be pre authorized and signed by bots. The only way to guarantee this is a human doing that is with biometrics signing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

libovness pfp
libovness
@libovness
I think that USV founder has an inaccurate vision for the 5 paragraph essay being dead, which bears on this signing point. There is increasing adoption of this notion of a Flipped Classroom (https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/flipped-classrooms), which has the learners familiarize themselves with the material outside of...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gaby Goldberg pfp
Gaby Goldberg
@gaby
I co-wrote a related post arguing that every on-chain action (like a signature) is a message -- and that redefinition will change the way we think about web3's communication layer -- would love to hear your thoughts: https://tcg.mirror.xyz/CCtokn_XR9yqGhL3OIKM4u8IxaVO0V0fmRxH-G5yWs8
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wutwut pfp
wutwut
@wutwut
Curious how this practice will interface with the wider topic of accountability. Seems like the small cousin of saying something under oath. Also saw a different facet of this on Twitter yday https://twitter.com/semil/status/1599617292479840257?s=46&t=wKKpGWKlDIDQwFzRNN9IKg
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Venkatesh Rao ā˜€ļø pfp
Venkatesh Rao ā˜€ļø
@vgr
Thereā€™s a problem to be solved here but signing everything is basically like swearing to tell the truth in court. A ceremonial norm. Only meaningful if perjury is detectable and criminalized, and even then not a solution so much as an incentives-based accommodation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cyrus  pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
i remember thinking the same thing (for some reason) the first time i saw google's AI demo ordering a pizza. just looked up the video and interesting to see how Google displays information about provenance: no source attribution/verification & timestamp "4 years ago" smh https://i.imgur.com/wlZppFA.png
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
Cryptographic identity is needed to sign, but most users and developers don't care So challenge #1 is how to integrate crypto identity into mainstream apps by default farcaster://casts/0xf7d55f1ba7daa2b4a999f371f04af7c8a5925483763dd644315f07676237d748/0xf7d55f1ba7daa2b4a999f371f04af7c8a5925483763dd644315f07676237d748
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Andy Jagoe pfp
Andy Jagoe
@andyjagoe
yes, which makes me think: AI -> single player (use cases easy to imagine) web3 -> multiplayer (uses cases hard to imagine) iirc, we saw this also in early web2 days: search -> single player (use cases easy to imagine) social -> multiplayer (uses cases hard to imagine)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dave Pazdan pfp
Dave Pazdan
@paz
with deepfakes becoming more common especially with AI, having signed original versions will be super important. Would love to see us get to a place where we don't have to trust others, we can verify on the blockchain if something is original or altered footage, music, art, writing, etc.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
i agree. differentiating between human and AI content will become important as these models improve. but im unsure how verifying via signatures would work. you could technically paste a gpt-3 prompted essay into mirror and have it signed. this is a pretty cool area though
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Victor Ma šŸ§¾ pfp
Victor Ma šŸ§¾
@vm
thanks for sharing, curious how folks are supposed to know the 2nd part of this, do you have a list somewhere of your owned/controlled wallets? "You can see that ā€œauthor addressā€ and click on it to see that it is one of the various web3 addresses I own/control."
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

William Allen pfp
William Allen
@williamallen.eth
I setup an entity with the Linux foundation to help address this a few years ago - c2pa.org - itā€™s got decent traction within big companies and bi-partisan support in the US govā€™t, but needs stronger crypto adoption.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Agost Biro pfp
Agost Biro
@agostbiro
Sign everything = keys for everything
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
ai begs new questions about what makes us human and agree that a shared understanding of our marks and their meaning is foundational. have you read andy's signature economies piece? i think you'd enjoy it https://sign.kernel.community/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Miko Matsumura pfp
Miko Matsumura
@miko
this is a good ideal
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Arthur pfp
Arthur
@conft
Didnā€™t thought of web3 as the other side of the coin.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

miketrap pfp
miketrap
@miketrap
Totally buy this. Connecting the dots between generative AI (the rage de minuit) and Web3 (so 15 minutes ago for VCā€¦) Point is validā€¦ Generative AI will increase the value of trust in the world, which will increasingly be provided by Web3 technologies.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction