Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Proof of human is not sufficient, either. https://x.com/nikitabier/status/1834979355501776928
23 replies
10 recasts
272 reactions
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
Proof of qDAU
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
frdysk.framedl.eth pfp
frdysk.framedl.eth
@fufuprophet.eth
we just need dwr approved arbitrators going round the world giving out PBs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
There's 8 billion of us, I'm sure a substantial percentage is very happy to post slop all day. Maybe we need cozy spaces for slop, as an outlet.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
Proof of human is a red herring IMHO. When it comes to curation of content/access, trust is all that matters. Whether it’s an algorithm or human, I’m more likely to listen to them if I trust them. Proof-of-human is people trying to cram permissionlessness into systems that don’t need to be. It’s attempting to create a shortcut for trust, which takes time.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
And soon it may not even be an indicator. Tbh, some of the LLM-generated comments are better than engagement-farming, human-generated comments.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
HH pfp
HH
@hamud
that reminds me when organised crime managed to sybil worldcoin's proof of humanity by farming eyeballs from strangers.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
zach roth pfp
zach roth
@zachroth.eth
I got my eyeball scanned at fwb fest 😬
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Augustine Cost pfp
Augustine Cost
@guscost
Proof of “player character” maybe
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tmophoto pfp
Tmophoto
@tmophoto
We are pretty close to 60% of the whole internet being generated by ai right now. Its not going to take long for human generated content being less than 1% of all content published online.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Breck Yunits pfp
Breck Yunits
@breck
Everytime I interact with @gmfarcaster live I think, this is how the bot problem gets solved. It can be scaled.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jawa pfp
Jawa
@jawa
Doesn’t this same analysis applies to social media as well?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wizard not parzival pfp
wizard not parzival
@alexpaden
can you write about search and discovery
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth pfp
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
You realize that’s one of the opacity use case, but we can do more than proof of humanity. We can stitch together your full digital presence
1 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions
Mike | Abundance pfp
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
Only real way to deal with it is change the incentives. We're overindexing for engagement
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Catabolismo pfp
Catabolismo
@catabolismo
Let people post silly things in peace.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rafaello.base.eth pfp
Rafaello.base.eth
@rafaello12
Do you think we’ll start seeing a demand for AI free or AI limited spaces as a response to the high amount of spammers. Could that be the next big opportunity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
onten.eth | Ⓜ️🍖🎩 pfp
onten.eth | Ⓜ️🍖🎩
@rezaisgoat.eth
If the AI spams higher quality contents than the other people post, I have no problem with it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lucas | POAP Studio pfp
Lucas | POAP Studio
@gabo
Good thing we have /poap over here 😋🌸
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cristian 🎩 pfp
Cristian 🎩
@cristianisbased.eth
What happens when there are more bots than humans? 🤣 I give it another decade and AI will take over at a rate we didn't even imagine now
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction