Dan Romero on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

20 recasts

20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

What is the most frustrating thing about Farcaster right now? Reply and like the replies from others that resonate. I’ll only ask clarifying questions (ie I won’t tell you you’re wrong) and then respond to a dozen or so top answers in a video this weekend with how we think about it.

83 replies

10 recasts

97 reactions

Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp

Zinger ↑ is job hunting

The fact that users have to pay just to create an account, there’s no “free trial” I know you guys are working on driving down the cost but it’s still unclear what the incentive is for non-WC apps to use FC for identity given that it adds friction and the value ultimately accrues to Merkle

6 replies

0 recast

22 reactions

Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp

Zinger ↑ is job hunting

For Warpcast: replies are second-class citizens even though that’s where most of the interesting interactions happen Too much focus on top-level “bangers” and one level of reply bumping isn’t enough Usually the deeper the reply thread the more engaging it gets, would love to see a UX oriented around that

1 reply

0 recast

19 reactions

Ben 🟪 pfp

No native token = never ending supply of new tokens trying to become the de facto token of Farcaster.

3 replies

0 recast

13 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp

I feel that signers are a ticking bomb. Very low visibility on what signed with with signer, who has a signer you have approved, what will happen if you remove it, etc. Maybe it's my OCD (I only have it for this type of things), but it stops me from feeling free to use stuff.

2 replies

0 recast

10 reactions

Colin Johnson 💭 pfp

Colin Johnson 💭

1. The protocol should theoretically allow for simple transactions to be seamless and they are not. Kind of a crypto problem. 2. Scanning channels is burdensome, making #3 worse 3. My actions create a worse algo. I’ll like casts to support people or because I’m influenced by their momentum. I’d like an aspirational feed rather than a reflective feed.

2 replies

0 recast

9 reactions

will pfp

love the “i’ll only ask clarifying questions” add-on btw, generated some very interesting discussions in the comments imo

0 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑ pfp

mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑

@mikedemarais.eth

managing multiple accounts

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

pugson pfp

1. app crashes and barely works on a spotty network connection 2. uploading photos takes a long time when your wifi is not great or the size is big. it should happen in the background

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Nicholas Charriere pfp

Nicholas Charriere

I find it hard to discover new interesting content (in a very passive and lazy way)

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Joris 🧢 pfp

One of the most frustrating things about Farcaster right now is the new channels feature. It’s frustrating when a channel that should be 'community-owned' ends up being locked down by an 'owner' (often early FID but ...) who limits it to just 10 or 50 members able to post. If a channel is meant to serve the broader community, it shouldn’t be locked or controlled by a single owner. Would love to see more flexibility and openness in how these channels are managed.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

matthewb.eth pfp

better multi-account support would be a big help, currently using Supercast to fill the void but can’t answer DMs

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Erik pfp

warpcast specific: photo resolution

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

rob pfp

@robertfelt.eth

having to dm a mod of a channel to become a member

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

petar.xyz pfp

I think my ‘frustrations’ are Warpcast related, not Farcaster: 1. No chronological feed - I use /recaster to scroll and see casts not arranged by an algorithm 2. Misleading cast engagement metrics - I have to open Recaster or Supercast to see the real number of likes, recasts and replies on my casts I know why you hide certain cast engagements because you try to battle spam But I think your spam filters are too aggressive and hide many real likes, recasts and replies 3. Missing active badge - to me, this badge is a signal of account authenticity, not a vanity symbol; I’m more inclined to follow or follow back an account with an active badge than one without because chances are the latter is a bot Again, I’m switching between Recaster and Supercast to check which Farcaster accounts have active badges

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

a1z2 💫 pfp

Hard to form connections. I’m not interested in growing a following, so much as connecting with like minded people. It’s probably more of a me problem, not a protocol problem. I’m hoping the recent channel changes allow more interest-based connection.

2 replies

0 recast

13 reactions

aferg pfp

@aaronrferguson.eth

I seem to miss a lot of content now that I’d previously see…my notifications have gone pretty quiet and I’m not sure what the root cause of it might be

1 reply

0 recast

10 reactions

Breck Yunits pfp

Wasting time thinking about what channel to post to. I like channels, but that should be auto done by an AI and happen AFTER the post.

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

carlos pfp

1 - new users are born nerfed 2 - having to copy/paste or search users to add them to channels 3 - no animated pfps

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp

Protocol governance seems a bit opaque & def centralized w zero commitments (that I’ve heard) to decentralize. The protocol is TOO BIG. I admire the ambition but break this shit up. Consider: Identity Verify-Store-Sync (☝️assuming channels land here) Private/group Messaging Protocol revenue centralized. Consider apps that onboard users keep the revenue. Govern some of these ‘unique’ protocols less often. The protocol should not need a paid staff once hardened. ok maybe an admin but no devs as goal. Please don’t create ICANN. All said with admiration & 💜

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction