Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
Would you want a channel only for your Paragraph subscribers? Only subscribers could create new casts and/or reply.
14 replies
4 recasts
37 reactions

Jared Hecht pfp
Jared Hecht
@jaredhecht.eth
Yes.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

aaronv pfp
aaronv
@aaronv.eth
omg this is super interesting.... like a private discussion group for the topics at hand. hmm.... πŸ€”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sophia pfp
Sophia
@sophia
genius! (but is it embarrassing if i only have two subscribers?)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kairon pfp
Kairon
@k41r0n
This would be a dream tbh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tmo - agent operator pfp
tmo - agent operator
@tmoindustries
Yes πŸ™Œ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Yes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adam-
Yes! Absolutely in for this implementation. The current workflow seems to be creators spinning up private DC rooms, which doesn’t have the same toolset or flow that a channel has. Curious to get @yb’s thoughts on this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mkkstacks pfp
Mkkstacks
@mkkstacks
I'm getting started on paragraph and imagine readers might be interested in continuing a conversation or diving deeper into content on channels. It incentivizes readers to stay engaged and contribute to the community, and connects them to others with shared interests. I like the idea.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Fernandes pfp
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
Token gated chat is exactly what Status is building, might be a good fit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

weeb3dev pfp
weeb3dev
@weeb3dev
yup
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jawa pfp
Jawa
@jawa
Fantastic idea!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Benjamin βŒβ—¨-β—¨ pfp
Benjamin βŒβ—¨-β—¨
@latsko.eth
Very keen in further experimenting with 😎
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction