Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
What are some properties that a token launch should have for you to consider it ethical / values-aligned and not decrease your excitement for the project?
163 replies
303 recasts
1395 reactions

Idan Levin 🎩 pfp
Idan Levin 🎩
@idanlevin
Lots of good answers here, one is missing: Transparency around the market making. Many projects are closing obscured deals with market makers, which create tokens market that are artificial. It can include low circulating supply. All these deals details are not public
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions

Harper pfp
Harper
@harpcaster
If the project relies on Ethereum it should allocate some portion of tokens to the protocol guild.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Sassal.eth πŸŽ©β›½ pfp
Sassal.eth πŸŽ©β›½
@sassal.eth
Airdropping a decent chunk of the initial supply to solo/home stakers is a must imo because these users are some of the most engaged and aligned in the Ethereum ecosystem. Also donating 1% to the Protocol Guild is key. https://warpcast.com/sassal.eth/0x6a351028
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kitty.International pfp
Kitty.International
@kittyintl
As a dev - I want to be able to able to make cats have sex with each other - ideally with a prostitution layer so I can pimp my cats and make sweet eth.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Emil pfp
Emil
@hungf
Token launch ethical / values-aligned? What century are you living in? This is the era of FOMO, rug pull and pump and dump. πŸ˜‚
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

valle.xyz pfp
valle.xyz
@vallexyz
Why are the ethics around a token launch diametrical opposed to the ethics of equity financing for startups? At startups it is always 100% cap table, all shares locked for years. Can there be a middle ground?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

milos 🎩 pfp
milos 🎩
@m1los
For me, an ethical and values-aligned token launch should prioritize transparency, community engagement, a legitimate use case, decentralization, sustainability, security, legal compliance, ecosystem development, social responsibility, and anti-scam measures
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Owocki pfp
Owocki
@owocki
funding public goods w some % of the treasury
0 reply
0 recast
19 reactions

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️ pfp
nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️
@nir
it serves as actual ownership in the thing it represents rather than LARPing as ownership or serving as a meme/status symbol for the thing.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

polynya pfp
polynya
@polynya
>50% supply circulating when transferable <33% total supply to insiders (team, investors, partners, MMs etc.) Bias distribution towards known (pseudonymous fine) contributors and users, over random airdrop farmers with arbitrary distribution criteria Reality, typical launch today- 10% circulating supply, 50% insiders
6 replies
5 recasts
94 reactions

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
- Min. 3 year vesting for insiders - Less than 33% to the cap table - Clear separation of power between labs and foundation - Strong set of core governance delegates - Clear product roadmap of how the token interfaces with the product / protocol - Thorough comms on core values and purpose of decentralization
4 replies
2 recasts
53 reactions

Eddy Lazzarin 🟠 pfp
Eddy Lazzarin 🟠
@eddy
Seeing that the originators of the project, and those receiving tokens, are locked up for a long time (at least one year, ideally 3+) is a good, basic indicator that the project is serious. A <1 year lockup is a big red flag.
3 replies
1 recast
31 reactions

Salvino Armati ↑ pfp
Salvino Armati ↑
@salvino
Radical transparency around investor allocations / unlock schedules. - if you raised funding, what were the entry prices of those investors? - what are unlock schedules for investors/founders/employees? are unlocks happening onchain?
1 reply
0 recast
15 reactions

Paul Berg pfp
Paul Berg
@prberg
The airdrop should be vested.
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
I may be bias but I think the launch of $DEGEN was probably the best token launch in awhile.
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Keep allocation details and vesting schedule transparent. Commit a large part of the supply to existing ecosystem/public-goods participants: Gitcoin Matching Pool, solo stakers, Protocol Guild. Another large part for users with an attempt to do something close to one-allocation-per-human without making it dystopian.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Christian Montoya 🦊 pfp
Christian Montoya 🦊
@m0nt0y4
I get a decent amount and the price goes up
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Bixbite πŸ‘½ pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
Fair launch, max mint per wallet to ensure fair distribution, sybil resistance to avoid botting (ex. captcha before mint) over 50% of mint funds go towards LP, team & dev allocations locked & vested w/ cliff unlocks, you know the usual - Also supply has to have 69 or 420 in it, I don't make the rules! πŸ’β€β™€οΈ
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Thibauld pfp
Thibauld
@thibauld
* Limited insiders allocation. I see ~33% floating around but I'd even go lower than that. I think ~25% is probably better. * Clear future issuance schedule. * No market makers. * Governance minimalism. Tokens only give voting rights on: -- changing smart-contract parameterss -- voting for retroactive token allocations
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions