polynya

@polynya

127 Following

242093 Followers

polynya pfp

The darkest characteristic of the crypto industry is not all the harm (and evidently, death) it causes, but that no one cares

5 replies

11 recasts

62 reactions

polynya pfp

Blockspace demand/supply graph, the current situation and what's happening (S*) What should happen: the industry must pivot completely to demand-side, instead of continuing to be all-in on the supply side

20 replies

124 recasts

535 reactions

polynya pfp

Correction, as some point out: at least one person did die No silver linings I guess, cryptobro degeneracy remains a virulent affliction

1 reply

18 recasts

113 reactions

polynya pfp

Checking in on my final blog post nearly one year on My only regret is it was not alarmist enough, should have gone harder & more brutally honest This was the most hate I've ever received, a little more wouldn't matter Silver lining, the memecoin bubble burst before we got into truly violent territory and someone died (that we're aware of) https://polynya.mirror.xyz/ptscXuh3J3KOj2uJAn0vrEanpn2nauwA7iytYZ4cM9U

13 replies

27 recasts

153 reactions

polynya pfp

I'd like to see more sophisticated rate-limiting features on Safe and competing multisig wallets. Is it possible via transaction guards? How can non-coder users access it? So, for example: - Can only send $10,000 via the Uniswap contract per 24 hours - Can only send $1,000 to address X per 1 hour Nothing else can be sent from the wallet. Changing these requires X/Y multisig permissions, and takes 7 days to execute. Just an example, but the point is, the user can customise as per their needs. Rationale: User doesn't lose everything in one go if hacked - there's time and possibility to fix the situation.

8 replies

22 recasts

125 reactions

polynya pfp

Alas, in the 2+ years since, the vast majority in crypto have pivoted sharply towards full on greed, degeneracy, nihilism, and crime. Of course, there's a small minority that continues working on useful sustainability, and I have the utmost respect for them, but that keeps getting smaller by the day.

10 replies

40 recasts

208 reactions

polynya pfp

Finally, a good usecase for a memecoin Redistribute wealth from degenerate cryptobros to a LDC (corruption aside) https://x.com/FA_Touadera/status/1888722674265764017

3 replies

13 recasts

69 reactions

polynya pfp

Quite amusing that a year after I quit CT, Elon gave my account a Verified tick for free, and another year after that I still have that tick, for free. Surely, at some point they'll realise the account is inactive and take it back?

16 replies

16 recasts

133 reactions

polynya pfp

I haven't commented about rollups in several months, if not over a year, so I'm just a casual observer now... Native rollups are pretty cool, and what I meant by "enshrined zkEVM bridge" a couple of years ago (except they've got a wider scope than zkEVMs) However, they are not "enshrined rollups", as I wrote about them at least, which are in-protocol, L1 rollups Overarching thought on rollups: there simply has not been anywhere enough demand to saturate 1,000+ chains by 2025 like I had expected in 2021. Including all L1s and L2s, there's maybe like 10, at most. I'm sure demand will grow, but not to the magnitude anyone expected. It would be prudent to factor in this lower terminal demand in infrastructure designs, instead of just "build it they'll come" hopium. https://x.com/apolynya/status/1629651981768990720

3 replies

81 recasts

89 reactions

polynya pfp

It is pretty clear that Bitcoin as a blockchain is a colossal waste of energy. As BTC custody continues centralizing to a few ETFs, CEXs, institutions, in the long term >50% of BTC will be held by a handful of organisations Might as well just cancel PoW and move to PoA at that point. It would actually be *more decentralized* as PoW will inevitably centralize over to a handful of industrial players and pools due to crippling economies of scale. Plus, it'll solve the security budget problem. As before, the full nodes will be there as the last line of defence irrespective The only thing matters for BTC is it remains a speculative store-of-value, doesn't matter the mechanism to achieve that https://x.com/i/trending/1885868663116296256

23 replies

56 recasts

385 reactions

polynya pfp

I used to complain a lot about DeFi, L2 tokens etc. and their abysmal token distributions in 2021/22, to deaf ears That particular slippery slope has met its valley Just straight up criminal extortion, no filter 🤣

8 replies

27 recasts

123 reactions

polynya pfp

It's surreal to see cryptobros cheer on blatant capture by 1 country, real or imagined, by heavily shilling "American coins", with very little resistance Just more evidence for what we all know - very few give a fuck about defending a neutral globally accessible system, it's all about greed & whatever pumps your bags

22 replies

61 recasts

182 reactions

polynya pfp

While I mentioned academia specifically in my last cast about Bluesky, I've also noticed a lot of the cutting-edge discussions around finance, economics, markets etc. have steadily been moving to Bluesky. There's no reason Farcaster couldn't be a good fit for these communities, this is a once-in-a-decade opportunity. And no, none of these topics are about politics, since for some reason a lot of responses shoehorned politics into it.

15 replies

27 recasts

156 reactions

polynya pfp

Lately, I've been more active on Bluesky (different topic, different anon), and it's growing pretty fast. Given Elon has oriented Twitter towards anti-intellectualism, certain communities have moved wholesale already, particularly academia related. It's basically just Twitter without the bloat, but slower still... Farcaster is more interesting to me, but Bluesky has won the attention game - no one knows Farcaster exists outside the niche crypto crowd.

37 replies

46 recasts

386 reactions

polynya pfp

Vitalik discovering capitalism

6 replies

53 recasts

226 reactions

polynya pfp

A personal note on this: I spent the last year of my blogging career focusing on exploring from first principles the fundamentals of blockchains. It hasn't gotten much attention, but I still believe it's by far the most impactful writing on my old blog. Blockchains are only useful for strict global consensus, with the key overarching usecase being objective accounting. For everything else, there are far more efficient and more decentralized options available/to be invented. Being dogmatic about only using blockchains has actively hindered growth for years - to expand the onchain economy we must adopt & invent better solutions, even if its not technically "onchain".

10 replies

20 recasts

162 reactions

polynya pfp

Crypto's greatest contributions to humanity: 1) Adding an overwhelming body of evidence to the millennia old universal truth: money is the root of all evil [...] 2) Digital store-of-value commodity as an alternative to Gold 3) Stablecoins that make USD more accessible in countries with high inflation + it's restricted

14 replies

12 recasts

106 reactions

polynya pfp

Beam Chain is basically the "zkEthereum" endgame I hoped for and wrote about in 2021, that plus the data layer and zkEVM upgrades. Back then, I had expected something like "about a decade", albeit delivered incrementally. So, anything sooner than early 2030s sounds like a win for Ethereum's Endgame. The one thing I'd like to see is what I called an "Enshrined zkEVM bridge" (a standardized in-protocol bridge for all "Type 0" zkEVM rollups) though maybe that's more suited for the EL, idk

6 replies

12 recasts

98 reactions

polynya pfp

My favourite invention in crypto is Uniswap range orders. Most crypto apps are alternatives to stuff that have existed, but Uniswap range orders are largely unique, offers a great way to scale in and out of positions, and earn while you're doing it! That and ZKPs as a broader category, of course.

4 replies

25 recasts

82 reactions

polynya pfp

As some of you have noticed, a big theme on this Farcaster profile is objectivity vs. subjectivity The human experience is extremely complex, multi-faceted, diverse, and thus deeply subjective Financialization is an attempt to dumb some things down into objective numbers. For some things, like capital allocation, exchange of goods, it works brilliantly. Blockchains are exclusively the domain of the strictly objective. But for almost everything else, forcing subjective matters into objective outputs leads to potentially catastrophic outcomes, and the root cause is plutocracy - determining governance by wealth, to the worst-case scenario, truth itself. I don't need to tell how that's peak dystopia and an affront to humanity. Fuck "info finance" with a bag of stale scrotums

9 replies

13 recasts

88 reactions