polynya

@polynya

127 Following

334318 Followers

polynya pfp

I used to complain a lot about DeFi, L2 tokens etc. and their abysmal token distributions in 2021/22, to deaf ears That particular slippery slope has met its valley Just straight up criminal extortion, no filter 🤣

8 replies

101 recasts

218 reactions

polynya pfp

It's surreal to see cryptobros cheer on blatant capture by 1 country, real or imagined, by heavily shilling "American coins", with very little resistance Just more evidence for what we all know - very few give a fuck about defending a neutral globally accessible system, it's all about greed & whatever pumps your bags

20 replies

206 recasts

405 reactions

polynya pfp

While I mentioned academia specifically in my last cast about Bluesky, I've also noticed a lot of the cutting-edge discussions around finance, economics, markets etc. have steadily been moving to Bluesky. There's no reason Farcaster couldn't be a good fit for these communities, this is a once-in-a-decade opportunity. And no, none of these topics are about politics, since for some reason a lot of responses shoehorned politics into it.

14 replies

50 recasts

276 reactions

polynya pfp

Lately, I've been more active on Bluesky (different topic, different anon), and it's growing pretty fast. Given Elon has oriented Twitter towards anti-intellectualism, certain communities have moved wholesale already, particularly academia related. It's basically just Twitter without the bloat, but slower still... Farcaster is more interesting to me, but Bluesky has won the attention game - no one knows Farcaster exists outside the niche crypto crowd.

20 replies

111 recasts

619 reactions

polynya pfp

Vitalik discovering capitalism

4 replies

41 recasts

277 reactions

polynya pfp

A personal note on this: I spent the last year of my blogging career focusing on exploring from first principles the fundamentals of blockchains. It hasn't gotten much attention, but I still believe it's by far the most impactful writing on my old blog. Blockchains are only useful for strict global consensus, with the key overarching usecase being objective accounting. For everything else, there are far more efficient and more decentralized options available/to be invented. Being dogmatic about only using blockchains has actively hindered growth for years - to expand the onchain economy we must adopt & invent better solutions, even if its not technically "onchain".

8 replies

26 recasts

138 reactions

polynya pfp

Crypto's greatest contributions to humanity: 1) Adding an overwhelming body of evidence to the millennia old universal truth: money is the root of all evil [...] 2) Digital store-of-value commodity as an alternative to Gold 3) Stablecoins that make USD more accessible in countries with high inflation + it's restricted

13 replies

50 recasts

178 reactions

polynya pfp

Beam Chain is basically the "zkEthereum" endgame I hoped for and wrote about in 2021, that plus the data layer and zkEVM upgrades. Back then, I had expected something like "about a decade", albeit delivered incrementally. So, anything sooner than early 2030s sounds like a win for Ethereum's Endgame. The one thing I'd like to see is what I called an "Enshrined zkEVM bridge" (a standardized in-protocol bridge for all "Type 0" zkEVM rollups) though maybe that's more suited for the EL, idk

6 replies

14 recasts

115 reactions

polynya pfp

My favourite invention in crypto is Uniswap range orders. Most crypto apps are alternatives to stuff that have existed, but Uniswap range orders are largely unique, offers a great way to scale in and out of positions, and earn while you're doing it! That and ZKPs as a broader category, of course.

4 replies

25 recasts

104 reactions

polynya pfp

As some of you have noticed, a big theme on this Farcaster profile is objectivity vs. subjectivity The human experience is extremely complex, multi-faceted, diverse, and thus deeply subjective Financialization is an attempt to dumb some things down into objective numbers. For some things, like capital allocation, exchange of goods, it works brilliantly. Blockchains are exclusively the domain of the strictly objective. But for almost everything else, forcing subjective matters into objective outputs leads to potentially catastrophic outcomes, and the root cause is plutocracy - determining governance by wealth, to the worst-case scenario, truth itself. I don't need to tell how that's peak dystopia and an affront to humanity. Fuck "info finance" with a bag of stale scrotums

9 replies

16 recasts

131 reactions

polynya pfp

"Info finance" is pretty emblematic of financialisation gone too far to become outright dystopian It's happening, there's no turning back, but I'll personally avoid it like the plague

1 reply

7 recasts

34 reactions

polynya pfp

Over the last decade or so I've been commenting on crypto (different pseudonyms) I've noticed a very clear pattern - the reaction to my content is directly proportional to how bullish the audience perceives them to be for their bags. That makes me appreciate the few who react positively even if I'm being critical.

12 replies

32 recasts

180 reactions

polynya pfp

A couple of years ago, I identified two main usecases for blockchains: objective money/finance and objective identity However, over time, I've warmed to the idea that objective identity does not actually require strict global consensus. A less strict, loosely ordered global consensus may be adequate Really, it's only money that requires strict consensus, or anything else of *temporal* economic value While identity does have economic value, it is in most cases non-temporal in nature, and can hence be achieved better with loosely ordered alternatives to blockchains

8 replies

59 recasts

159 reactions

polynya pfp

Though well-written and inspirational, I believe this post fundamentally misunderstands Ethereum and blockchains. Ethereum's distinctive property is objective, strict global consensus, and absolutely nothing else. It's great for usecases that require strict global consensus, but it's impossible for everything else, because Ethereum cannot parse any subjectivity or rough consensus at all. As such, while money, contracts, governance, identity, law are presented as examples, Ethereum can only parse very, very limited forms of the above, where it's objective. In some cases, like governance or law, it's almost entirely subjective with negligible scope for Ethereum to help. 99.99% of economics, institutions and the like are deeply human and subjective, which Ethereum or blockchains in general cannot interpret at all. Indeed, we've seen many a times how forcing subjectivity into objective code has led to many disastrous outcomes in crypto. (Contd...)

9 replies

107 recasts

274 reactions

polynya pfp

The reason why "DAOs" require traditional governance is because blockchains can only do strict global consensus The assumption is you need a token to organise said governance, but this is not true. Indeed, some DAOs would be much better off following the worker cooperative or consumer cooperative model, rather than the public company model, with democratic voting and vetos for checks and balances (instead of being controlled by few whales, as it is for almost all crypto projects now - not just not decentralized, but very centralized. VCAOs, if you will, pun intended) Yeah, I get it, token gambling is crypto's big usecase, but it doesn't have to be. Building the best possible protocol to attract the most users might not be such a bad idea for the long term

11 replies

105 recasts

210 reactions

polynya pfp

Tangentially, all other value accrual mechanisms in crypto should be minimised to remain competitive with non-crypto solutions Fees, commissions, margins, and yes, tokens, all of that needs to tend towards zero Tokenless, governanceless, intermediariless, non-profit protocols are the true USP PS: only applies for valuable 3-5 usecases where strict global consensus is useful, for everything else non-crypto is simply better

9 replies

157 recasts

243 reactions

polynya pfp

It's evident that alternative store-of-value is >90% of the demand driver for the crypto industry, and arguably the only demand driver for its dominant asset - BTC. Yet, it seems there's very little investment in improving this dominant usecase and biggest success story. BTC remains a ticking time bomb, and aside from BTC & ETH, most crypto assets are high inflation dumpsters (literally, for VCs).

10 replies

72 recasts

176 reactions

polynya pfp

Unfettered financialisation will never solve subjective human problems - indeed, they often make it worse as power is derived from wealth This is a common delusion in crypto, and other than being hazardous, more importantly is distracting from the problems crypto can help with

8 replies

54 recasts

156 reactions

polynya pfp

7 replies

79 recasts

244 reactions

polynya pfp

I've definitely been slacking on my "1 cast per week" goal, so to make up for that, how about I do an AMA for the first time? Topics I won't reply to: trad crypto infra (L1, L2 etc), prices, or personal questions

43 replies

135 recasts

270 reactions