Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I wrote a bit about Farcasters consensus model, and the specific tradeoffs we had to navigate. Planning on sharing more broadly tomorrow, any feedback is appreciated! https://www.varunsrinivasan.com/2024/04/28/the-goldilocks-consensus-problem
17 replies
74 recasts
421 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso ⌁ pfp
Gabriel Ayuso ⌁
@gabrielayuso.eth
Great write up! 🙏 I'd love to learn more about how the deltagraph approach is different from other CRDT-based eventual consistency systems such as some NoSQL DBs. I'd also like to learn about some of the main challenges with keeping nodes up-to-date on the global state as the amount of deltas increases.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
MJC pfp
MJC
@mjc716
great piece, learned a lot. how does the deltagraph receive and validate the blockchain data?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
John Jung pfp
John Jung
@jj
Finally had a chance to read it. 1. About ordering. You’re saying order doesn’t matter in casts but in replies order does matter in maintaining a sequence or posts. Would this be affected?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
John Jung pfp
John Jung
@jj
2. Security concerns and reliance on local consensus. How would you address the security trade offs like Sybil or network partitioning attacks? Where either reliability is affected because of numerous manipulated data flows, identities or nodes. Or potentially manipulating node networking
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
John Jung pfp
John Jung
@jj
3. Charging rent for data storage will be a barrier for wide scale adoption especially trying to get into countries where the exchange rates are much higher. Is this the long term plan?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
John Jung pfp
John Jung
@jj
4. Reliance on sync mechanism to find missing deltas at some point will hit a ceiling as the number of nodes continues to increase. Will you ever limit the number of writable nodes?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Royal pfp
Royal
@royalaid.eth
Extremely well written summary. There are a few places where it seems some of the technical underpinnings are just known, CDRTs for example, that might benefit from a one sentence explainer when they are introduced but even that feels a bit nit-picky. Definitely helped me understand what is going on a lot better.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
𝚣𝚘𝚣 🎩 pfp
𝚣𝚘𝚣 🎩
@zoz.eth
Very informative thread. Haven’t been following technical design recently and this is 🔥
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Vladyslav Dalechyn pfp
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
Awesome illustrations! Gotta research the eclipse attack now.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Taylor pfp
Taylor
@skyron.eth
Great article, @v. Even for a non-technical reader, your explanation of the architecture makes a lot of sense.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pepo pfp
Pepo
@pepo
Very cool, thanks. One question, "who" and "how" collects the rent paid?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CARDELUCCI🎩 pfp
CARDELUCCI🎩
@cardelucci
Thank you for this 100 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
stellabelle🎩 pfp
stellabelle🎩
@stellabelle
interesting, didn’t know what CRDT means
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
compusophy pfp
compusophy
@compusophy
learned a lot!! can think of the obvious benefits, but wondering how deltagraphs inability to move money hinders decentralized scalability would be nice to have - micropaying for storage + surge pricing - incentives for nodes - integrated transactions / tipping / subscriptions at that point, just be your own chain?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
libra ♎ pfp
libra ♎
@0xlibra
Great work 30 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction