Varun Srinivasan on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

Should we make Warpcast's spam categorization publicly available? Image a 5 category system for every account: not spam, maybe not spam, unknown, maybe spam, definitely spam. What would you do with this if it was available today?

23 replies

12 recasts

104 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

The main hesitations here is that spammers can use real-time rankings to find ways to avoid labels. But if its useful to people we should make it public.

3 replies

8 recasts

22 reactions

Reeeny pfp

Notify users that they are considered spam along with guidelines on what to do to not be labeled spam. If they are bots, there is no harm done and if they are real people they will appreciate the heads up - if the message is well written.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

kompreni 🅱️ ⚡ pfp

kompreni 🅱️ ⚡

Yes but can u do it on the dnd spectrum?

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Michael Pfister pfp

Michael Pfister

We’d use it to improve @buoy, making the tiers available as search filters

1 reply

0 recast

8 reactions

Deployer pfp

would probably look into using it for /lp channel moderation.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Jacob pfp

would use it to limit bot-to-bot interactions

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Linda Xie pfp

Yes we would use that for Bountycaster in filtering out bounty replies and bounty posts

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Garrett pfp

yes would be interesting for people to experiment with the different filtering

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

jacopo.eth pfp

could be especially useful if the list was onchain and periodically maintained like neynar’s user score would add support for it on @slice

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Royal pfp

its actually a pretty difficult question to answer because people could start to reverse engineer the spam filtering from the labels and train around them. It would be a net boon to the ecosystem in the short term but it might be a PITA long term. FWIW I don't feel strongly one way or the other

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp

Chinmay 🕹️🍿

I would use it to set message send limits at @percs

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

jd 🌺 pfp

open source is always the way sailor

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp

Chinmay 🕹️🍿

If the models are open, the cat and mouse game accelerates. Do you have resources to play the game?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Colin Charles pfp

Personally, I would find ways to mark as not spam. There should be some kinda way to ensure the algorithm doesn't negatively penalise real accounts! Otherwise it ends up a little like the X shadowban

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

DV pfp

@degenveteran.eth

Love the categories. Why not call some of them NOT spam...that label is known in a negative consultation (in a sense) Unless they really ARE Spam So "Spam", "learner" this is so people understand the person may actually be learning the Platform (we should be aware of these accounts like "learning how to drive bumper sticker") @atlas what other options for labels would be informative but now viewed as bad as "spam"

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

LucentMonk 🍖***🎩 pfp

LucentMonk 🍖***🎩

Yes, but also have those categories on a toggle so I can allow my account to see whichever categories I want.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Rundle 🍖 pfp

yes please as someone who has been buried by the algorithm even after changing my behaviour it would have been great to know I was on the path to a spam label so that I could have adjusted earlier

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

base pfp

I would be interested, Im working on a bot/ai agent and I think in the process of testing I may have gotten it marked as spam...maybe my account too?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction