Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Should we make Warpcast's spam categorization publicly available? Image a 5 category system for every account: not spam, maybe not spam, unknown, maybe spam, definitely spam. What would you do with this if it was available today?
19 replies
12 recasts
137 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
The main hesitations here is that spammers can use real-time rankings to find ways to avoid labels. But if its useful to people we should make it public.
3 replies
8 recasts
37 reactions

Mike | Abundance pfp
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
Doesn't "find ways to avoid labels" just mean behave in less spammy ways? It's generally useful for good actors to know if the platform labels them as potential spammers and what they can do to avoid such labeling so I'm 100% for it (and not even talking about how devs/other clients can benefit from this)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tatiansa 🟪. ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Tatiansa 🟪. ⌐◨-◨
@tatiansa
This is important for real people who are currently with a spam filter and don't understand how the algorithms work to get rid of it. Maybe it's worth making access through some kind of frame with a captcha so that only real people and those who need it use it, since the public option can really have a negative impact and make such people even less noticeable.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
sharing definitely spam (trickled via neynar) would cause more account to be included in my data analysis which as a hack is pwoer user only
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions