ted (not lasso) on Warpcast

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/theai

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

with the emergence and proliferation of AI-generated content, i believe we will have to shift from a default-true to default-false mental model when interacting with online content. but holy shit do you know how depressing it is to assume the worst in everyone, which to me is to assume that they are inauthentic?

37 replies

13 recasts

60 reactions

assayer pfp

imo default-false was always a reasonable attitude but we're bad at using infotech those doors - computer screens - take us to every place in the world including the most dangerous places - why would you ever trust ppl you do not know at all? ai because it is so alien may actually help us here make us more cautious 444 $degen

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Chinmay 🧺 📈 pfp

Chinmay 🧺 📈

Depressing and even more stressful. This is where an open graph will be actually helpful. Most people will only consume information from a selected few that has a history of providing correct information. The history will be public and completely auditable.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

law pfp

Your second paragraph is the situation of warpcast ever since the beginning of this month lol It was way easier for me to get people’s attention and to tell them about what I’ve got to offer than it is now (Cus everyone is in the “i believe you’re all being inauthentic until proven otherwise” mode)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc pfp

EulerLagrange.eth - shitpost/acc

@eulerlagrange.eth

What I’m working on with zkTLS can potentially help here with identity and provenance. Can be used to know it’s a unique human, but the content is in the general case hard to solve for. If it were my way, someone can try and pass of ai content but if they get caught would burn that identity

2 replies

1 recast

22 reactions

Joe / 0xOsprey.eth pfp

Joe / 0xOsprey.eth

you're so correct We need to become more critical of "what" we can actually verify and "how" easy can we make it to verify @witness we shared this piece that describes the 3 verifiable properties of any piece of data: what, who and when https://witness.co/blog/what-the-hell-is-digital-ownership

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

keccers pfp

It’s called PROGRESS Ted and all of this is just INEVITABLE ok GOD what are you a DECEL

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Maretus pfp

I have been thinking about this a lot lately. I think we are intrinsically getting better at filtering inauthenticity and AI responses subconsciously. Or at least, I feel like that's happening with me already. Recently, especially with Moxie, I have found myself skipping over comments that I would have engaged with months past. And what's weird is that I don't consciously give it much thought anymore. I just kinda see past it. I hope this continues to happen even more as AI proliferates. Maybe we can all 'develop an eye' for it. idk. 🤷‍♂️

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

erica pfp

tbh i've questioned everything i've ever read online that seemed fishy but i also spent a ton of time in research labs so it comes second nature steps: 1. read something online 2. "huh, that seems unlikely" 3. google scholar 4. find peer reviewed paper from legitimate journal 5. look at what group they tested on, blind/double blind, controls 6. read actual findings & conclusion 7. determine if original info was true, false, or a misinterpretation of research/knowledge, or if the article is biased and misleading itself it's a lot to ask of folks who are just doom scrolling and mindlessly consuming content... and this is just for scientific claims, not historical or even deep fakes and ai-generated images fuuuuuu

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Polymarket pfp

onchain prediction markets will save the world. (many such cases)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Christian Montoya 🦊 pfp

Christian Montoya 🦊

Who the heck has been operating with a default-true mental model this entire time???

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

AuntiePapi pfp

@auntiepapi.eth

The engagement debacle has lead people down the wrong path. Religious folks are more inclined to assume the best in people (as in perhaps assuming a person is genuine) You could surround your world with your closest friend (and spam everyone else I guess) but then that blocks off people who are genuine and who want to know who you are and discuss with you. I don’t think that will bring justice to any situation (and I would say it wouldn’t to your well being) assuming the worst. I suppose we have to trust but verify. And set a mutually agreed upon standard of verification.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

I‘d be worried if that’s not the default model anyways. Default false is what I go with. Default curious to research if important enough. Else I discard If researched/ quickly checked then I switch to true or allegedly

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tudor 🟣🟡 pfp

“on the internet, nobody knows I’m dog” was already a default-false moment. Unsure when it became a default-true. Maybe once more people and corps were onboarded. Same old, same old.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Just Build pfp

I don't think this is as done a deal as the media makes this out to be. Everyone assumes that we won't be able to develop AI tools that can certify unique or unaltered content. My pov is that both realities are in play.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

DavidBeiner pfp

aren’t we already at a point where we assume most of what’s posted online is generally inauthentic and playing for likes. not talking about this app but internet in general

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Michael Varde pfp

@michaelvarde.eth

Ugh, you’re totally right, Ted. Hopefully WC will develop a way to screen for AI generated/altered content. It would be amazing if there was a setting where people could choose to only view authentic human generated content. ✨

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Freytrades🎩📈 pfp

Freytrades🎩📈

most people are, they don’t really like the idea and the stress that comes with being authentic and like to blend. I can’t and you shouldn’t blame them, it’s what the world is.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

stringtheory pfp

@stringtheory69

Precedence for intimacy could be good

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

binocularsXL🚀 pfp

binocularsXL🚀

That’s why I appreciate community notes on Twitter It’s just so sad genuine people have to suffer because of the effects of AI-generated content

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction