ted (not lasso) on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

with the emergence and proliferation of AI-generated content, i believe we will have to shift from a default-true to default-false mental model when interacting with online content. but holy shit do you know how depressing it is to assume the worst in everyone, which to me is to assume that they are inauthentic?

41 replies

9 recasts

94 reactions

EulerLagrange.eth pfp

EulerLagrange.eth

@eulerlagrange.eth

What I’m working on with zkTLS can potentially help here with identity and provenance. Can be used to know it’s a unique human, but the content is in the general case hard to solve for. If it were my way, someone can try and pass of ai content but if they get caught would burn that identity

2 replies

1 recast

16 reactions

Joe / 0xOsprey.eth pfp

Joe / 0xOsprey.eth

you're so correct We need to become more critical of "what" we can actually verify and "how" easy can we make it to verify @witness we shared this piece that describes the 3 verifiable properties of any piece of data: what, who and when https://witness.co/blog/what-the-hell-is-digital-ownership

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Maretus pfp

I have been thinking about this a lot lately. I think we are intrinsically getting better at filtering inauthenticity and AI responses subconsciously. Or at least, I feel like that's happening with me already. Recently, especially with Moxie, I have found myself skipping over comments that I would have engaged with months past. And what's weird is that I don't consciously give it much thought anymore. I just kinda see past it. I hope this continues to happen even more as AI proliferates. Maybe we can all 'develop an eye' for it. idk. 🤷‍♂️

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

erica pfp

tbh i've questioned everything i've ever read online that seemed fishy but i also spent a ton of time in research labs so it comes second nature steps: 1. read something online 2. "huh, that seems unlikely" 3. google scholar 4. find peer reviewed paper from legitimate journal 5. look at what group they tested on, blind/double blind, controls 6. read actual findings & conclusion 7. determine if original info was true, false, or a misinterpretation of research/knowledge, or if the article is biased and misleading itself it's a lot to ask of folks who are just doom scrolling and mindlessly consuming content... and this is just for scientific claims, not historical or even deep fakes and ai-generated images fuuuuuu

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

keccers pfp

It’s called PROGRESS Ted and all of this is just INEVITABLE ok GOD what are you a DECEL

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Dvyne pfp

If it makes you feel better Most people are not their real selves on the internet

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zack pfp

Default-false has been my mindset since 2016 when it comes to digital information channels. But feels like this is separate from assuming good intent and I don't think AI changes that.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Polymarket pfp

onchain prediction markets will save the world. (many such cases)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Christian Montoya 🦊 pfp

Christian Montoya 🦊

Who the heck has been operating with a default-true mental model this entire time???

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Samuel pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

I‘d be worried if that’s not the default model anyways. Default false is what I go with. Default curious to research if important enough. Else I discard If researched/ quickly checked then I switch to true or allegedly

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Just Build pfp

I don't think this is as done a deal as the media makes this out to be. Everyone assumes that we won't be able to develop AI tools that can certify unique or unaltered content. My pov is that both realities are in play.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

binocularsXL pfp

@binocularsxl.eth

That’s why I appreciate community notes on Twitter It’s just so sad genuine people have to suffer because of the effects of AI-generated content

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Vera Faye pfp

I’m curious as to what type of AI-generated content you are referring to. imo AI assistance provides some benefits to creators who are using it responsibly and transparently. by proxy, there’s a lot of potential benefit to viewing. I also don’t think it’s going away and we will adapt like humans always do.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

antaur ↑ pfp

yes - and - this is one reason why I am mega curious about what reality we'll be able to notarise with /faust

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

meta-david🎩 | Building Scoop3 pfp

meta-david🎩 | Building Scoop3

blockchain can fix this so we can stay in the default-true modal 😎

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp

Chinmay 🕹️🍿

Depressing and even more stressful. This is where an open graph will be actually helpful. Most people will only consume information from a selected few that has a history of providing correct information. The history will be public and completely auditable.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tony pfp

still being default-true in 2024 is an achievement in itself, you made it far further than most

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Samir 🎩 pfp

This is also getting worst with the lack of tools detecting fake content from real one! More over some cases will need real investigation ti get a result fake/notfake

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Anthony Pete🧾🎩🍖🎭🌳 pfp

Anthony Pete🧾🎩🍖🎭🌳

Right now almost everyone is relying on ai for almost everything But when you see authenticity you’d know it sincerely Cause true art you’d notice a repetition not in a bad way but like in design style or drawing style

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction