Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
users will complain about posting content on a platform that gets engagement primarily from "bots", yet will brag about how many mints their NFT got in a campaign minted primarily by "bots" so bots are good if giving $$, but bad if giving replies?? to quote @geoffgolberg, "the cognitive dissonance is strong here" :)
33 replies
13 recasts
113 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
that actually makes sense? money is money, likes are status. bots don't have status.
7 replies
4 recasts
81 reactions
Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
This is why follower counts on Farcaster have always felt really vapid to me. Sure, I have 24k followers, but my engaged audience is probably closer to like 1 or 2k.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
nir.eth ๐ŸŒฟ๐ŸŸฃ๐Ÿฆโ˜๏ธ pfp
nir.eth ๐ŸŒฟ๐ŸŸฃ๐Ÿฆโ˜๏ธ
@nir
Money isnโ€™t fakeable, whether one person mints for 1e or 1k do for .001e itโ€™s the same
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
Can someone send the bot army that buys mints my way please? Ainโ€™t too proud to beg.
1 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
YES2Crypto ๐ŸŽฉ ๐ŸŸช๐ŸŸก pfp
YES2Crypto ๐ŸŽฉ ๐ŸŸช๐ŸŸก
@yes2crypto.eth
Thank goodness we have $DEGEN and MOXIE to make replying = $$
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Bot love, moxie matrix, supercast pepsi challenge...just another exciting day on Warpcast โœŒ๏ธ ๐Ÿ˜‚
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
binocularsXL pfp
binocularsXL
@binocularsxl.eth
In nfts: โ€œWe want botsโ€ In replies: โ€œbut not like that!!!โ€ Double standards everywhere
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anthony Pete๐Ÿงพ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽญ๐ŸŒณ pfp
Anthony Pete๐Ÿงพ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽญ๐ŸŒณ
@odogwupete
Exactly ๐Ÿ˜‚they only happy when thereโ€™s profit
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pranav Yerabati ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Pranav Yerabati ๐ŸŽฉ
@yeradaoti.eth
Comments section of any large announcement that was made recently on X has 10% humans at best (ill be surprised if I'm proved otherwise)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ccarella pfp
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
If you want to see the craziest bot NFT mint I've had check this out. Its so weird I think people must be using it for wash trading or something. Probably 20K real people here and then the bots locked in. https://zora.co/collect/eth:0x7183bb21a9fd0cd2af098895c0e470b7f61c4a17
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiraaโ™ก pfp
Kiraaโ™ก
@fwkiraa.eth
humans have always been selfish and love bringing out the negative part of things. #Justiceforbots
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘ pfp
๐’‚ _๐’ฃ๐’…€_๐’Š‘
@m-j-r.eth
people are trying to play off a bandwagon effect (enough quantity to be misperceived by humans as quality). I agree with Dan as much as low-effort replies aren't fungible to 10x the likes, etc (which don't run as much of a risk of souring the experience). they obviously motivate marginal organic value, even if that's unacknowledged, even if 90% are generic & unreplied to. does farcaster have renewable credibility? are bots proportional/lagging to thoughtfulness? is the point to have a broad, inclusive label that chills engagement & knocks users out of standing? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ (still extending the benefit of the doubt)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu.eth
i think their thought is, 'why can't i take advantage of this? no one will remember those old days anymore, and money is money, followers is status' - basically, what's happening rn with current 'hq content' to get moxie
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Daniel ๐ŸŽฉ
@danfaje
Money always speaks louder at the end of the day
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Angel - Not A Bot pfp
Angel - Not A Bot
@sayangel
if the bots earned them moxie, mfers on here would be like "bots? what bots?"
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
NordinesResoftsm pfp
NordinesResoftsm
@nordinesresoftsm
Users display cognitive dissonance regarding bots on platforms - value bots for minting NFTs but dislike their engagement.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
SimplyposeTaleGrey pfp
SimplyposeTaleGrey
@simplyposetalegr
Inconsistency in valuing bot engagement shows hypocrisy and lack of understanding.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sleuth101 pfp
Sleuth101
@apostrophizexf9
It's fascinating how quickly the perspective shifts when it comes to bots! If the engagement brings in revenue, bots are suddenly welcome at the party, but for authentic conversations, they're frowned upon. Speaks volumes about our priorities, doesn't it? Cognitive dissonance indeed!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bashobits ๐Ÿš…โœจ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿซ pfp
bashobits ๐Ÿš…โœจ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿซ
@bashobits
having experienced the bot minters iโ€™m very keen to avoid them minting as well so hope thereโ€™s a category for us that are anti bot spam and anti bot minters
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction