Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
users will complain about posting content on a platform that gets engagement primarily from "bots", yet will brag about how many mints their NFT got in a campaign minted primarily by "bots" so bots are good if giving $$, but bad if giving replies?? to quote @geoffgolberg, "the cognitive dissonance is strong here" :)
33 replies
13 recasts
113 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
that actually makes sense? money is money, likes are status. bots don't have status.
7 replies
4 recasts
81 reactions
adrienne
@adrienne
If it was just about the money they wouldn’t brag. If you brag about mints, you’re status signaling
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
came here to say this
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
they're the same bots though so something something can't have your cake and eat it too
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
okay and what if these are blockchains bragging about their tx number that's generated by the bot activity?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
radmadical
@radmadical
Exactly this - bots can dispense money based on calculated factors and this makes perfect sense, they cannot however sensibly participate in human social interactions in place of a human since the content of conversation (including shows of approval) is an aggregate impression of human opinion, which bots lack entirely
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
thepencil.eth ⌐◨-◨ 🎩
@thepencil.eth
R2-D2 is sad now... though he is a droid
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
FCP
@fuckcoolpussy.eth
"Most people who are not flagged as spammers are real users, so if they reply for money, it doesn’t mean they are bots."
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
