Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
users will complain about posting content on a platform that gets engagement primarily from "bots", yet will brag about how many mints their NFT got in a campaign minted primarily by "bots" so bots are good if giving $$, but bad if giving replies?? to quote @geoffgolberg, "the cognitive dissonance is strong here" :)
33 replies
13 recasts
113 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
that actually makes sense? money is money, likes are status. bots don't have status.
7 replies
4 recasts
81 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
came here to say this
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
sure, you guys are right but to me, based on my values and what motivates me, it matters where i get my $$ from would i rather get $1M from selling a company i built or $1M from OnlyFans obvious answer
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Yeah, but Ted seems to be speaking to the general hypocrisy of the complaints. If you want to eradicate bots, you want to eradicate, you can't want them to only do the things you want them to. That's also irrational.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction