Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
Should interfacing with the blockchain be abstracted away or presented to users? 1. Fully abstracted 2. Partially abstracted 3. Not abstracted 4. Other Inspired by @4484
24 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
When responding: 1️⃣ Put your option # first 2️⃣ Add comments after 3️⃣ Join the Ponder channel to stay informed ⭐️ Want to earn @ponder rewards for your answers? Visit https://weponder.io and grab a pass
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
The survey results are in! https://warpcast.com/survey/0xd64c
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
4 it depends. shouldn't boil down to "trust me, bro". full abstraction will be necessary for mature pmf, which doesn't fully exist atm.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rani pfp
Rani
@4484
3. crypto needs to be seen and understood, not buried behind abstractions. its core features are unique, attempting to hide them away does a disservice to all the promise it holds.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joseph Delong pfp
Joseph Delong
@joseph.eth
Fully abstracted with a self custody option
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cartographer 🎩 pfp
Cartographer 🎩
@cartographer
3. Something sometime and somewhere will make wallets cool. And after that the new/unique/fun experiences of interacting with blockchains will be a GTM and user-acquisition strategy.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Colin Johnson 💭 pfp
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
2. It should feel seamless, but also inextricably connected to a blockchain. TBD on what that visualization looks like.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Amanda pfp
Amanda
@amandakeay
2. Seamless UX but not completely hidden
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
2 at some point in the future blockchain infrastructure will be abstracted in the same way databases are today. 99% of consumers won't care how it works under the hood, but those who do will have easy verifiable proof. I imagine the complexity of trust checking will be as simple as viewing a site's SSL certificate.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
4. Users should have the option that best suits their needs.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wanisili pfp
wanisili
@abstract
2. Every day I hear about the loss of assets in the crypto world. Some level of protection by a third party seems necessary.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BrixBountyFarm 🎩 pfp
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
1 Mass adoption comes with blissful ignorance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑langchain 🎩 pfp
↑langchain 🎩
@langchain
1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chukwuka Osakwe pfp
Chukwuka Osakwe
@chukwukaosakwe
1. Just in terms of adoption I think making sure people aren't too concerned with what's going on behind the scenes is going to be pretty important.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
freeboy pfp
freeboy
@789
2. "Perhaps some abstraction is better; a portion of those in need can get what they desire, while those who don't need it won't feel affected."
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
3070 ✅ pfp
3070 ✅
@3070.eth
1 at the interface level, i think as abstracted as possible is best. at the knowledge level, people should be aware of at least the publicly verifiable/transparent aspect of blockchains. saying that, ZKPs may also nullify the need for this knowledge (?)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
2. Should be almost fully abstracted for most users, but keep it transparant (i.e. Don't trust. Verify) with the option to customize/self custody
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Romain pfp
Romain
@greedywizard
1. Not abstracting feels equivalent to asking browser users to know about TCP/IP
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
trav 🎩🔵🧾 pfp
trav 🎩🔵🧾
@trav
1) fully But we still want the ability to look under the hood
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction