StevenWhite
@stevenwhitetqs
208 Following
351 Followers
8 replies
7 recasts
78 reactions
3 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
9 replies
3 recasts
47 reactions
0 reply
44 recasts
234 reactions
1 reply
23 recasts
164 reactions
8 replies
9 recasts
54 reactions
3 replies
9 recasts
64 reactions
1 reply
42 recasts
271 reactions
6 replies
11 recasts
88 reactions
0 reply
19 recasts
111 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
19 reactions
2 replies
5 recasts
30 reactions
12 replies
30 recasts
186 reactions
4 replies
38 recasts
210 reactions
5 replies
11 recasts
98 reactions
4 replies
7 recasts
39 reactions
1 reply
9 recasts
23 reactions
2 replies
44 recasts
226 reactions
Some chatter on this, especially around the “eat their lunch” phrasing
My perspective as a user:
Warpcast has a difficult role to play: as the largest product on the Farcaster protocol, their actions will drive the majority of new user growth
Along the way, there will be other apps that emerge to fill gaps in the Warpcast value prop. Scheduled casts, onchain actions, real time chat, etc
As those features are validated by users, the Warpcast team is then faced with a choice: integrate these features into the main app (thereby stimulating growth), or intentionally avoid building it to reduce competition with ecosystem partners
The rub: if Farcaster doesn’t significantly grow, then all ecosystem apps will likely die anyway due to lack of sufficient users.
My personal framework around this topic is less vibes driven and more realpolitik; as an app builder, you have to be prepared for your great feature idea to be copied as soon as it’s proven to be successful with users. 7 replies
26 recasts
219 reactions
13 replies
9 recasts
48 reactions