Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/social
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
Is it possible for social media to solve boredom without rotting our brains?
33 replies
0 recast
32 reactions
Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
https://warpcast.com/stephancill/0x03b89341
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
got any ideas?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zinger ↑ pfp
Zinger ↑
@zinger
Doubtful that social media can but hopeful for social networks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
frdysk.framedl.eth pfp
frdysk.framedl.eth
@frdysk
Only with your own discipline
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
King pfp
King
@king
honestly no saving it open a good book 🫂
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Giwa 🎩 pfp
Giwa 🎩
@0xgiwa.eth
Yes it is, as long as you use it for something productive. Could be reading, watching educative videos etc
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tom Beck pfp
Tom Beck
@tombeck.eth
This framing is all wrong. Boredom is not a problem to be solved. It is a way to solve other problems.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Your BooThang🩷🌷🎩 pfp
Your BooThang🩷🌷🎩
@boothang
i honestly doubt this a lot of people have access to social media… and everyone being able to freely share their personal thoughts will definitely bring brain rot content… there’s no saving tbh
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiraa♡ pfp
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
Personally no. i have consumed too many brainrot content i feel it's too late to solve it. what do you think?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fadil pfp
Fadil
@blackkhammer.eth
For the average man, NO.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
g-mac 🔵 🎩🍖🍓 pfp
g-mac 🔵 🎩🍖🍓
@g-mac.eth
It depends if you consider the theory 'If you're not getting better you're getting worse' When you consider even the most thoughtful of casts/posts are a case of 'look what I've done (what I know/what I've found) It's all someone else's journey/development. Not time spent dedicated to improving yourself necessarily
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Yes it's possible, but the economics aren't in its favor. High effort content doesn't induce as much brain rot, but produces a dopamine hit for a smaller range of people vs. low effort content. Low effort content is more likely to result in brain rot. Low effort content is cheaper to produce. => we should expect to see more low effort content than high effort content, and therefore more brain rot
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
Not if the social media app wants to be popular. Are you on tildes?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TOM pfp
TOM
@subtlegradient
variety and human connection are two of the cardinal human needs. social systems succeed by micro dosing us with a steady drip of just enough novelty and connection to keep us coming back for more. these systems simply can’t succeed if they actually fill these needs many people at the edge of bell curves become trapped in toxic cycles of dependence similar to the old lady with the drum of nickels compulsively yanking the one armed bandit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LGHT pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
think so. algorithm configuration a big need tho
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason pfp
Jason
@jachian
Think it’s just a bad form factor for it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rafaello pfp
Rafaello
@rafaello12
lol I don’t think it’s possible I personally have consumed a lot of or garbage from TikTok and Twitter, but would I still use these apps?….. yes cause there’s still good content out there
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Emre Ekinci pfp
Emre Ekinci
@emr.eth
Content curation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Freytrades🎩📈 pfp
Freytrades🎩📈
@freymon.eth
definitely but it might do well only for a little time because there would be very limited options.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction