Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
Do you think self-custodial wallets will remain the go-to for interacting with smart contracts? https://warpcast.com/pugson/0xd7b2da
10 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
​woj
@woj.eth
99% of smart contract interactions will be built into apps with wallets inside them self custody for the user, experience controlled by developer power users will be able to interact with dapps however they won't but current paradigm will not stick for much longer
10 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
I'll take the opposite side of that: in 10 years, majority of onchain interactions will bypass bespoke contract frontends and will use procedural frontends (either a feature embedded in wallets, or standalone provider).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
​woj
@woj.eth
yeah i think this is exactly what im referring to
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
I think its the opposite though: you can have one address (if you want), and you can use uniswap, opensea, etc without ever opening those apps. Only apps provisioning their own EOAs will be weird edge case experiments until they get standardized into procedural frontends.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
​woj
@woj.eth
not really, there is only finite number of experiences that you can build into one app so once you want to do something outside of your app, you will install a new one and thus create a new address
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
Procedural frontends can be infinite. 🙃 I can also imagine a middle ground where we end up annotating contracts with more metadata hints on how to best render/interact with then. Not saying custom frontends will be gone, but right now it's 99%, someday it'll be closer to 20%.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
​woj
@woj.eth
i think i don't know enough about procedural frontends, can you link to some resources please?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
