Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
Do you think self-custodial wallets will remain the go-to for interacting with smart contracts? https://warpcast.com/pugson/0xd7b2da
10 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
99% of smart contract interactions will be built into apps with wallets inside them self custody for the user, experience controlled by developer power users will be able to interact with dapps however they won't but current paradigm will not stick for much longer
10 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
I'll take the opposite side of that: in 10 years, majority of onchain interactions will bypass bespoke contract frontends and will use procedural frontends (either a feature embedded in wallets, or standalone provider).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
yeah i think this is exactly what im referring to
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
I think its the opposite though: you can have one address (if you want), and you can use uniswap, opensea, etc without ever opening those apps. Only apps provisioning their own EOAs will be weird edge case experiments until they get standardized into procedural frontends.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
not really, there is only finite number of experiences that you can build into one app so once you want to do something outside of your app, you will install a new one and thus create a new address
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction